Cited by 20Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Depression, anxiety, and attachment among women hospitalized on an antepartum unit

Nagle-Yang, Sarah, Phillips, MacKenzie, Albaugh, Avril, Zhao, Lulu, Amin, Jaina, Ahmad, Erum, Hatters Friedman, Susan·2019·The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine

Abstract

Objective To examine the prevalence of depression, anxiety, attachment issues, and associated factors among pregnant women hospitalized on an antepartum unit. Method Ninety-eight women hospitalized on an antepartum unit reported demographic and social information and were evaluated with screening tools for depression, anxiety, and maternal–fetal attachment. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistical regression analysis. Results Over one third (36%) of participants screened at risk for depression. Almost half (47%) reported elevated state anxiety and over one third (37%) reported elevated trait anxiety. Depression and anxiety were frequently comorbid. Positive screens for depression and anxiety were associated with decreased maternal-fetal attachment. Those who screened at risk for depression and anxiety in this sample often had a personal or family history of depression or anxiety or a history of intimate partner victimization. Substance use was common among those with elevated anxiety. Only a minority (15%) of at-risk participants had been referred to mental health treatment. Conclusions Women hospitalized on antepartum units had an elevated risk of depression and anxiety. Depression and anxiety were strongly comorbid in this population. Screening efforts to increase detection of perinatal depression and anxiety are recommended on obstetrical antepartum units.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0091217419837071

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 20

Authors
Nagle-Yang, S., Phillips, M., Albaugh, A., Zhao, L., Amin, J., Ahmad, E., & Hatters Friedman, S.
Affiliations
  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (US)
  • University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
Corresponding author
Nagle-Yang, Sarah
Venue
The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine
Published
2019-03-29
Volume
54
Issue
6
Pages
395-407
ISSN
  • 0033-278X (ISSN-L)
  • 0091-2174
  • 1541-3527
OpenAlex
W2927350786
Cited by
20
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
perinatal depression, perinatal anxiety, maternal-fetal attachment, antepartum hospitalization, pregnant women, comorbid depression and anxiety, substance use, mental health screening, family history of depression
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Object Attachment, Pregnancy, Prevalence, Pregnant People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review