Cited by 97Biosimilars and Bioanalytical MethodsRheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research

Subcutaneous Bioavailability of Golimumab at 3 Different Injection Sites in Healthy Subjects

Xu, Zhenhua, Wang, Qingmin, Zhuang, Yanli, Frederick, Bart, Yan, Hong, Bouman‐Thio, Esther, Marini, Joseph C., Keen, Monica +3 more·2010·The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

This study characterized the pharmacokinetics (PK) of golimumab, an antitumor necrosis factor alpha human IgG1k monoclonal antibody, after a single intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous (SC) administration in healthy subjects and determined the absolute bioavailability of SC golimumab delivered at 3 different anatomical regions. Seventy‐eight healthy adult males were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of golimumab 100 mg by IV (30‐minute infusion, n = 23) or SC administration at different sites (upper arm, n = 18; abdomen, n = 18; thigh, n = 19). Serial blood samples were collected for PK characterization. Following IV administration, the mean maximum observed serum golimumab concentration (C max) and the mean area under the concentration versus time curves from time zero to infinity (AUC 0‐∞) were 29.5 ± 5.8 μg/mL and 195.9 ± 48.9 μg·d/mL, respectively. After SC administration, the mean values of C max and AUC 0‐∞ were 6.3 ± 2.8 μg/mL and 100.1 ± 29.2 μg·d/mL, respectively. The median terminal half‐life was similar for SC and IV administration (10.9 and 11.8 days, respectively). The overall mean bioavailability of SC golimumab was 51%, and absorption was similar for the 3 injection sites. Golimumab 100 mg was generally well tolerated in this study. Results support the flexibility in the choice of an injection site for SC administration of golimumab.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0091270009340782

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 97

Authors
Xu, Z., Wang, Q., Zhuang, Y., Frederick, B., Yan, H., Bouman‐Thio, E., Marini, J. C., Keen, M., Snead, D., Davis, H. M., & Zhou, H.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-03
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
276-284
ISSN
  • 0021-9754 (ISSN-L)
  • 0091-2700
  • 1552-4604
OpenAlex
W1978383327
Cited by
97
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Keywords
golimumab, subcutaneous administration, absolute bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, injection site, intravenous administration, TNF-alpha inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, healthy volunteers, tolerability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antineoplastic Agents, Biological Availability, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Immunoassay, Immunoglobulin kappa-Chains, Infusions, Intravenous, Injections, Subcutaneous, Male, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Time Factors, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review