Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 47Higher Education Research StudiesEducational Outcomes and InfluencesEvasion and Academic Success Factors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improving Student Outcomes via Comprehensive Supports: Three-Year Outcomes From CUNY’s Accelerated Study in Associate Programs (ASAP)

Kolenovic, Zineta, Linderman, Donna, Karp, Melinda Mechur·2013·Community College Review

Abstract

Community colleges are grappling with low rates of degree completion and transfer. The City University of New York’s (CUNY) Accelerated Study in Associate Programs (ASAP) aims to improve graduation rates by providing a range of comprehensive support services to community college students in select majors. Using student-unit record data, we employed propensity score matching to examine short-term and 3-year outcomes from ASAP’s first cohort, as well as logistic regression to identify program factors related to graduation. We found that ASAP participation was significantly positively related to retention, credit accrual, transfer, and degree attainment. Regression analyses indicated that a key influence on graduation is participation in advisement sessions. This study provides evidence that encouraging academic momentum via structured and comprehensive support can significantly improve community college graduation rates. It also provides evidence that ongoing and intrusive advisement can encourage positive academic outcomes among community college students.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0091552113503709

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Adelman C., 1999, Answers in the tool box: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor’s degree attainment
  2. Adelman C., 2006, The tool box revisited: Paths to completion from high school to college
  3. 10.3102/0162373711421958 · DOI
  4. Aud S., 2010, The condition of education 2010
  5. 10.1353/book.3282 · DOI
  6. Baum S., 2010, Education pays: The benefits of higher education for individuals and society
  7. 10.1177/0091552110395575 · DOI
  8. 10.1353/rhe.2007.0032 · DOI
  9. 10.1515/9781400831463 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s11162-007-9053-8 · DOI
  11. Cook B. J., 2007, Minorities in higher education twenty-second annual status report: 2007 supplement
  12. 10.1353/jhe.2011.0006 · DOI
  13. Engle J., 2008, Demography is not destiny: Increasing graduation rates of low-income college students at large public universities
  14. Engstrom C. M., 2008, Opportunity Matters, 1, 5
  15. Goldrick-Rab S., 2007, Promoting academic momentum at community colleges: Challenges and opportunities
  16. Grubb W. N., 2006, Defending the community college equity agenda, 195
  17. 10.1007/s11162-005-6933-7 · DOI
  18. Karp M. M., 2011, Towards a new understanding of non-academic support: Four mechanisms for encouraging positive student outcomes in the community college
  19. 10.2190/CS.12.1.e · DOI
  20. Karp M. M., 2008, Do support services at community colleges encourage success or reproduce advantage? An exploratory study of students in two community colleges
  21. Linderman D., 2009, Early outcomes report for City of New York (CUNY) Accelerated Studies in Associate Programs (ASAP)
  22. 10.3102/00028312026003422 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/BF01191156 · DOI
  24. Rosenbaum J. E., 2006, After admission: From college access to college success
  25. 10.2307/2335942 · DOI
  26. Rouse C. E., 2007, The price we pay: Economic and social consequences of an inadequate education, 99
  27. Scott-Clayton J., 2011, The shapeless river: Does a lack of structure inhibit students’ progress at community colleges?
  28. Scrivener S., 2007, Enhancing student services at Lorain county community college: Early results from the opening doors demonstration in Ohio
  29. Scrivener S., 2008, A good start: Two-year effects of a learning community program at Kingsborough Community College
  30. Scrivener S., 2009, More guidance, better results? Three-year effects of an enhanced student services program at two community colleges
  31. 10.2139/ssrn.286297 · DOI
  32. Tinto V., 1993, Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition
  33. 10.2307/2959965 · DOI
  34. Visher M. G., 2010, Guiding developmental math students to campus services: An impact evaluation of the Beacon program at South Texas college
  35. Weiss M., 2011, Serving community college students on probation: Four-year findings from Chaffey college’s opening doors program

Metadata

Authors
Kolenovic, Z., Linderman, D., & Karp, M. M.
Affiliations
  • City University of New York (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Venue
Community College Review
Published
2013-10
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
271-291
ISSN
  • 0091-5521 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-2325
OpenAlex
W1971847644
Cited by
47
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
12.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Community College Review (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • City University of New York
  • Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evasion and Academic Success Factors
Keywords
community college students, graduation, student retention, transfer, academic support, City University of New York

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review