How Behaviors are Influenced by Perceived Norms: A Test of the Theory of Normative Social Behavior
Abstract
Normative restructuring strategies currently under way to combat alcohol-related problems among U.S. college students are based on the idea that students harbor inflated perceptions about the prevalence of drinking on campus and that if these misperceptions can be corrected, then alcohol consumption will decrease. Evidence for the effectiveness of these strategies is lacking, and there is little discussion in the literature about how or why people’s normative beliefs exert influence on their behaviors. The theory of normative social behavior that is proposed in this article includes three mechanisms—injunctive norms, outcome expectations, and group identity—that are hypothesized to moderate the influence of descriptive norms on behavior. This theory is tested through a survey (N = 1,352) conducted among incoming college students. Although all normative mechanisms predicted behavioral intention, four of the six variables also interacted with descriptive norms to influence intention, with relatively smaller effects. Overall, the model was able to predict 63% of the variance in intention to consume alcohol. Implications for health campaigns are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Our results support the norm-behavior-link proposed by general social norm theories, such as the TNSB.
“More generally, they first support the norm-behavior-link that has been proposed by general social norm theories, such as the TNSB (Real & Rimal, 2007; Rimal & Real, 2005).”
From The Impact of Social Norms on Adolescents’ Self-Presentation Practices on Social Media (2024) · cites this paper as Rimal & Real, 2005
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 67 · Cited by 927
- Authors
- Rimal, R. N., & Real, K.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Venue
- Communication Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 389-414
- ISSN
- 0093-6502 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3810
- OpenAlex
- W2138918478
- Cited by
- 927
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 66 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 7.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Communication Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
- Keywords
- perceived norms, descriptive norms, injunctive norms, outcome expectations, group identity, alcohol consumption, university students, behavioral intention, alcohol-related problems, health campaigns
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review