The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Controllability of Stressful Events and Satisfaction With Spouse Support Behaviors
Abstract
Among married couples, the effect of the controllability of stressful events was tested as a predictor of the type of social support communications provided and preferred. Sixty married individuals disclosed stressful events to their spouse. Controllability of the stress was rated by observers. The Social Support Behavior Code was used to assess the frequency with which each of five types of social support was provided by the spouse. Action-promoting support (information) was provided most frequently when the stressed person had high control over the event. Of the five types of support communications assessed, only information was evaluated differently in high- and low-controllable situations. Both controllability by the support recipient and controllability by his or her spouse were relevant to support evaluations. Results provide limited support for the optimal matching model proposed by Cutrona and Russell (Cutrona, 1990; Cutrona & Russell, 1990).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
(1990) · Computers, Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,269
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Cohen, J. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203771587 · Cited by 25,373
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,259
Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 · Cited by 18,093
An Analysis of Coping in a Middle-Aged Community Sample
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136617 · Cited by 6,328
Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1973) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447303300309 · Cited by 3,354
Social support: An interactional view.
Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I. G., & Pierce, G. R. (1990) · Wiley eBooks · Cited by 2,657
Social support as coping assistance.
Thoits, P. A. (1986) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.54.4.416 · Cited by 1,780
Handbook of Stress: Theoretical and Clinical Aspects
Goldberger, L., & Breznitz, S. (1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,680
The health-related functions of social support
Schaefer, C., Coyne, J. C., & Lazarus, R. S. (1981) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf00846149 · Cited by 1,330
Cited by
A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships
Feeney, B. C., & Collins, N. L. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868314544222 · Cited by 1,521
Collins, N. L., & Feeney, B. C. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1053 · Cited by 1,303
Social Media Use for Health Purposes: Systematic Review
Chen, J., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/17917 · Cited by 1,073
Social Networks and Health: Models, Methods, and Applications
Valente, T. W. (2010) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301014.001.0001 · Cited by 933
Collins, N. L., & Feeney, B. C. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.363 · Cited by 733
Metadata
- Authors
- CUTRONA, C. E., & SUHR, J. A.
- Venue
- Communication Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1992-04
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 154-174
- ISSN
- 0093-6502 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3810
- OpenAlex
- W2119797455
- Cited by
- 928
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 2.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Controllability of Stressful Events and Satisfaction With Spouse Support Behaviors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/009365092019002002
- The paper
- CUTRONA, C. E., & SUHR, J. A. (1992). Controllability of Stressful Events and Satisfaction With Spouse Support Behaviors. Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019002002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
