The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gendered Pathways: A Quantitative Investigation of Women Probationers' Paths to Incarceration
Abstract
Although qualitative research in the area of gender-responsive offending pathways has grown extensively, little quantitative work has been conducted. This study utilizes interview and survey data to assess various gender-responsive needs with an intake cohort of 313 women probationers. Using a path analytic approach, the study statistically supported three gendered pathways to women offenders' incarceration: (a) a pathway beginning with childhood victimization that contributed to historical and current forms of mental illness and substance abuse; (b) a relational pathway in which women's dysfunctional intimate relationships facilitated adult victimization, reductions in self-efficacy, and current mental illness and substance abuse; and (c) a social and human capital pathway in which women's challenges in the areas of education, family support, and self-efficacy, as well as relationship dysfunction, contributed to employment/financial difficulties and subsequent imprisonment. Support for such gendered pathways has implications for both criminological explanations of female offending and correctional interventions for women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Social Work · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,519
Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital
Coleman, J. S. (1988) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/228943 · Cited by 26,975
Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital
COLEMAN, J. (2000) · Knowledge and Social Capital · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-7222-1.50005-2 · Cited by 21,666
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(2012) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_121117 · Cited by 20,570
Bourdieu, P. (2002) · Readings in Economic Sociology · doi:10.1002/9780470755679.ch15 · Cited by 13,906
Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology
Portes, A. (1998) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1 · Cited by 12,037 · cited 3×
“Although there have been various definitions of social capital over time, Portes (1998) indicated that there is general consensus among sociologists that social capital “stands for the ability to secure benefits by virtue of membership in social networks or other social structures” (p. 6).”
BackgroundInfluentialIn a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development.
Johnson, M. M., & Gilligan, C. (1983) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2067520 · Cited by 11,111
In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory And Women's Development
Gilligan, & Carol, C. (1982) · Cited by 10,869
The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation
Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663 · Cited by 4,028
The Psychology of Criminal Conduct
Hart, S. D., Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1995) · Political Psychology · doi:10.2307/3792235 · Cited by 2,900
Cited by
Gender-Responsive Lessons Learned and Policy Implications for Women in Prison: A Review
Wright, E. M., Van Voorhis, P., Salisbury, E. J., & Bauman, A. (2012) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854812451088 · Cited by 215
Self-citationGobeil, R., Blanchette, K., & Stewart, L. (2016) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854815621100 · Cited by 142
Effects of Correctional-Based Programs for Female Inmates: A Systematic Review
Tripodi, S. J., Bledsoe, S. E., Kim, J. S., & Bender, K. (2011) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731509352337 · Cited by 63
Designed to fit: The development and validation of the STRONG-R recidivism risk assessment
Hamilton, Z., Kigerl, A., Campagna, M., Barnoski, R., Lee, S., van Wormer, J., & Block, L. (2016) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854815615633 · Cited by 49
Female pathways to crime and prison: Challenging the (US) gendered pathways perspective
Nuytiens, A., & Christiaens, J. (2016) · European Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/1477370815608879 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Salisbury, E. J., & Van Voorhis, P.
- Venue
- Criminal Justice and Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-05-07
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 541-566
- ISSN
- 0093-8548 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3594
- OpenAlex
- W2124643122
- Cited by
- 559
- References
- 82
- FWCI
- 34.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gendered Pathways: A Quantitative Investigation of Women Probationers' Paths to Incarceration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0093854809334076
- The paper
- Salisbury, E. J., & Van Voorhis, P. (2009). Gendered Pathways: A Quantitative Investigation of Women Probationers' Paths to Incarceration. Criminal Justice and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809334076
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
