The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Meta-Analysis Exploring the Relationship Between Psychopathy and Instrumental Versus Reactive Violence
Abstract
The present meta-analysis explored the relationship between psychopathy and instrumental and reactive violence with a focus on factor and facet scores. A total of 53 studies (reporting on 55 unique samples, N = 8,753) from both published and unpublished sources were included. Results from random-effects analyses indicated moderate and significant relationships between psychopathy and both instrumental and reactive violence. There was some evidence that the Interpersonal facet was more important for instrumental violence, while Factor 2 (social deviance) was more important for reactive violence. The Lifestyle facet appeared important in explaining both violent outcomes. Effect sizes were significantly smaller for clinical rating scales compared with informant and self-report scales. Significant between-study variability was partly explained by mean age of the sample and type of outcome measure. The current findings do not support the conclusion that psychopathy is more related to instrumental violence as opposed to reactive violence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488618 · Cited by 99,167
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis
Wasserman, S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,326
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index?
Huedo-Medina, T. B., Sánchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F., & Botella, J. (2006) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.11.2.193 · Cited by 4,256
A Fail-Safe N for Effect Size in Meta-Analysis
Orwin, R. G. (1983) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164923 · Cited by 2,064 · cited 1×
“Orwin’s (1983) fail safe N was also calculated, which would indicate the number of studies with a clinically unimportant finding (set at r = .”
BackgroundAggression: Its Causes, Consequences, and Control
Berkowitz, L. J. (1993) · Cited by 1,950
Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population.
Levenson, M. R., Kiehl, K. A., & Fitzpatrick, C. M. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.68.1.151 · Cited by 1,768
Raine, A., Dodge, K., Loeber, R., Gatzke‐Kopp, L., Lynam, D., Reynolds, C., Stouthamer‐Loeber, M., & Liu, J. (2006) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.20115 · Cited by 1,652
Refining the construct of psychopathy: Towards a hierarchical model.
Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (2001) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.13.2.171 · Cited by 1,535
Cited by
Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2018) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000111 · Cited by 519
Fido, D., Rao, J., & Harper, C. A. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107141 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Blais, J., Solodukhin, E., & Forth, A. E.
- Venue
- Criminal Justice and Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-02-13
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 797-821
- ISSN
- 0093-8548 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3594
- OpenAlex
- W2168602578
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 99
- FWCI
- 2.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Meta-Analysis Exploring the Relationship Between Psychopathy and Instrumental Versus Reactive Violence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0093854813519629
- The paper
- Blais, J., Solodukhin, E., & Forth, A. E. (2014). A Meta-Analysis Exploring the Relationship Between Psychopathy and Instrumental Versus Reactive Violence. Criminal Justice and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813519629
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
