Cited by 30Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Matching needs to services: Prison treatment program allocations

Long, Joshua S., Sullivan, Carrie, Wooldredge, John, Pompoco, Amanda, Lugo, Melissa·2019·Criminal Justice and Behavior

Abstract

The criminogenic needs of prison inmates are assessed to help guide their treatment plans, but inmates are often not matched to corresponding services to address those needs. A sample of 69,129 inmates in a state prison system was examined to identify those who completed treatment programs matched to their assessed needs and those who did not complete such programs. The odds of returning to prison within 3 years after release were compared for both groups. Of the eight need-specific domains examined, significant differences in the odds of prison returns were found for individuals identified with a Community Functioning need and for those identified with a Personal/Emotional need. That is, persons with either of these needs who completed suitable programs were less likely to return to prison compared with those with the same needs who did not complete suitable programs. Implications for future research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0093854818807952

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The extent to which risk assessments can be used to provide targeted rehabilitation services is less understood.

    “However, the extent to which risk assessments can be used to provide targeted rehabilitation services is less understood (Long et al., 2019).”

    From Prison Rehabilitation Programs: Efficiency and Targeting (2021) · cites this paper as Long et al., 2019

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 30

Authors
Long, J. S., Sullivan, C., Wooldredge, J., Pompoco, A., & Lugo, M.
Affiliations
University of Cincinnati (US)
Corresponding author
Long, Joshua S.
Venue
Criminal Justice and Behavior
Published
2018-11-08
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
674-696
ISSN
  • 0093-8548 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3594
OpenAlex
W2899976325
Cited by
30
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
6.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Criminal Justice and Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
correctional treatment programs, criminogenic needs, recidivism, reentry, community functioning, state prisons, program allocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review