Matching needs to services: Prison treatment program allocations
Abstract
The criminogenic needs of prison inmates are assessed to help guide their treatment plans, but inmates are often not matched to corresponding services to address those needs. A sample of 69,129 inmates in a state prison system was examined to identify those who completed treatment programs matched to their assessed needs and those who did not complete such programs. The odds of returning to prison within 3 years after release were compared for both groups. Of the eight need-specific domains examined, significant differences in the odds of prison returns were found for individuals identified with a Community Functioning need and for those identified with a Personal/Emotional need. That is, persons with either of these needs who completed suitable programs were less likely to return to prison compared with those with the same needs who did not complete suitable programs. Implications for future research are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The extent to which risk assessments can be used to provide targeted rehabilitation services is less understood.
“However, the extent to which risk assessments can be used to provide targeted rehabilitation services is less understood (Long et al., 2019).”
From Prison Rehabilitation Programs: Efficiency and Targeting (2021) · cites this paper as Long et al., 2019
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Long, J. S., Sullivan, C., Wooldredge, J., Pompoco, A., & Lugo, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Cincinnati (US)
- Corresponding author
- Long, Joshua S.
- Venue
- Criminal Justice and Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-11-08
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 674-696
- ISSN
- 0093-8548 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3594
- OpenAlex
- W2899976325
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 6.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Criminal Justice and Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Keywords
- correctional treatment programs, criminogenic needs, recidivism, reentry, community functioning, state prisons, program allocation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review