The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Discriminability of Rapists from Non-Sex Offenders Using Phallometric Measures: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract
The authors examined how well identified rapists could be discriminated from non-sex offenders using phallometric assessments, what variables might moderate this discrimination, and whether rapists respond more to descriptions of rape than to consenting sex. Eleven primary and five secondary phallometric studies involving 415 rapists and 192 non-sex offenders were examined using meta-analytic techniques. Study effect sizes averaged 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.16 to 1.49). Only stimulus set was a statistically significant moderator of effect size: Stimulus sets that contained more graphic rape descriptions produced better discrimination between rapists and non-sex offenders. There was a trend for stimulus sets that contained more exemplars off rape descriptions to achieve better discrimination. Also, rapists responded more to rape than to consenting sex cues in 9 of the 16 data sets and in all 8 of those using the more effective stimulus sets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research
Rosenthal, R. (1991) · doi:10.4135/9781412984997 · Cited by 4,635
A common language effect size statistic
McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.361 · Cited by 934
Cited by
Violent Offenders: Appraising and Managing Risk
Heilbrun, K. (2000) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.51.3.395 · Cited by 1,204
Mann, R. E., Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2010) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/1079063210366039 · Cited by 957
Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (2nd ed.).
Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (2006) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/11367-000 · Cited by 667
Self-citationPedophilia and sexual offending against children: theory, assessment, and intervention
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-5272 · Cited by 374
Recidivism and Age: Follow-Up Data From 4,673 Sexual Offenders
Hanson, R. K. (2002) · Journal Of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/088626002236659 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- LALUMIÈRE, M. L., & QUINSEY, V. L.
- Venue
- Criminal Justice and Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1994-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 150-175
- ISSN
- 0093-8548 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3594
- OpenAlex
- W2113556343
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Discriminability of Rapists from Non-Sex Offenders Using Phallometric Measures: A Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0093854894021001010
- The paper
- LALUMIÈRE, M. L., & QUINSEY, V. L. (1994). The Discriminability of Rapists from Non-Sex Offenders Using Phallometric Measures: A Meta-Analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854894021001010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
