Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 72Public Policy and Administration ResearchPublic Administration and Political AnalysisPublic Administration and Governance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Leadership in the Administrative State: The Concept of Administrative Conservatorship

Terry, Larry D.·1990·Administration & Society

Abstract

This essay provides an alternative framework for interpreting the leadership role of public administrators in governance. It is argued, contrary to the views held by a large band of public administration theorists, that leadership in the administrative state need not and should not be governed solely by the entrepreneurial leadership model. In fact, excessive entrepreneurship is seen as a threat to public institutions. An argument is presented that public administrators are engaged in a special kind of leadership called Administrative Conservatorship. Public administrators are depicted as guardians of public institutions and, in turn, regime values.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/009539979002100401

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Appleby, P., 1945, Big democracy
  2. Barnard, C., 1938, The functions of the executive
  3. Bass, B., 1985, Leadership and performance beyond expectations
  4. Corson, J., 1966, Men near the top
  5. Friedrich, C., 1958, Nomos I authority
  6. Gardner, J., 1986, The nature of leadership
  7. Goodsell, C., National Conference of the American Society for Public Administration
  8. Kanter, R., 1983, The change masters
  9. Kouzes, J., 1987, The leadership challenge
  10. Lewis, E., 1980, Public entrepreneurshlip: Toward a theory of bureaucratic political power
  11. Maidique, M., 1980, Sloan Management Review, 136
  12. Masuda, Y., 1980, The information society
  13. Michels, R., 1949, Political parties
  14. Mosca, G., 1938, The ruling class
  15. Naisbitt. J., 1982, Megatrends
  16. Pareto, V., 1935, The mind and society
  17. Perrow, C., 1986, Complex organizations: A critical essay
  18. Peters, T., 1982, In search of excellence
  19. Rohr, J., 1978, Ethics for bureaucrats
  20. Rohr, J., 1986, To run a constitution
  21. Seidman, H., 1980, Politics, position and power
  22. Selznick, P., 1952, The organizational weapons: A study of the Bolshevik strategy and tactics
  23. Tichy, N., 1984, The challenge of transition management
  24. Tichy, N., 1984, Sloan Management Review, 26, 58
  25. Toffler, A., 1980, The third wave
  26. Wamsley, G., First Symposium on Public Administration Theory, Lewis and Clark College
  27. Whetten, D., 1980, Academy of Management Review, 5, 577, 10.2307/257463 · DOI
  28. Wilson, H., 1975, Organized social complexities

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Terry, L. D.
Affiliations
Radford University (US)
Corresponding author
Terry, Larry D.
Venue
Administration & Society
Published
1990-02
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
395-412
ISSN
  • 0095-3997 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3039
OpenAlex
W2329267858
Cited by
71
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Administration & Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Governance
Keywords
leadership, public administration, administrative state, entrepreneurial leadership, public institutions, governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.