African American adolescent girls’ beliefs about skin tone and colorism
Abstract
Colorism is a pervasive system of inequality shown to negatively affect psychosocial and economic outcomes among African American adults. Among African American women and girls in particular, the social and psychological implications of colorist practices can be severe. The present study aimed to better understand African American girls’ understanding of this phenomenon during adolescence. Using a phenomenological approach, interviews and focus groups were conducted with African American girls ( N = 30) in order to determine which colorist messages are perceived and potentially internalized as communal beliefs. Iterative coding and subsequent thematic analysis revealed three primary themes and four subthemes: (a) Skin tone and attractiveness (Subthemes: Light skin as beautiful; Dark skin as unattractive), (b) Skin tone and social standing and education level (Subthemes: Dark skin as lower class; Light skin as higher class), and (c) Skin tone and personality/behavioral traits. Findings revealed that African American girls reported contemporary colorism biases similar to those found among African American women, suggesting temporal and generational continuity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This supports US qualitative research with Black women and adolescent Black girls that emphasises the negative impact of gendered colourism on participants.
“This supports US qualitative research with Black women and adolescent Black girls that emphasises the negative impact of gendered colourism on participants (Hall, 2017; Abrams et al., 2020).”
From Skin shade and relationships: how colourism pits Black and mixed Black-White women against each other (2024) · cites this paper as Abrams et al., 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 49
- Authors
- Abrams, J. A., Belgrave, F. Z., Williams, C. D., & Maxwell, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Corresponding author
- Abrams, Jasmine A.
- Venue
- Journal of Black Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 169-194
- ISSN
- 0095-7984 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4558
- OpenAlex
- W3029388632
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 8.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Black Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Keywords
- colorism, skin tone, African American adolescent girls, beauty standards, social class perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review