“Order as well as Decency”: The Development of Order Maintenance Policing in Black Atlanta
Abstract
In 1971, Ebony magazine named Atlanta the country’s “new Black Mecca,” citing its black political and economic leadership as well as the success of black businesses in the city. At this same time, however, Atlanta, like cities around the country, experienced rising crime rates and economic decline in its urban core. This article examines how Atlanta’s black political leaders, supported by both white and black business owners, responded to the crime crisis by privileging the preservation of order and the protection of capital in their public safety policies. It suggests that this commitment to orderliness, often overlooked in examinations of black political culture, undergirded black political leaders’ advocacy of punitive crime control procedures in the postcivil rights era. Analyzing how black political officials and property owners advocated for intensified foot patrol policing and public decency legislation, this article argues that the city’s black political class were early theorizers and codifiers of order maintenance, or “broken windows,” or still “quality-of-life” policing. Consequently, black business owners and municipal officials sanctioned the expansion of police power in low-income urban neighborhoods in the postcivil rights era.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Black residents made comparable demands for greater police accountability and protection from vice, crime, and violence throughout the twentieth century.
“Comparable demands from Black residents for greater police accountability and protection from vice, crime, and violence in their neighborhoods occurred throughout the twentieth century (Forman 2017;Adler 2019;Wiggins 2020;Jett 2021;King 2024).”
From To Protect and to Serve: Police, Power, and the Production of Inequality in the United States (2024) · cites this paper as Wiggins 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Mass Criminalization of Black Americans: A Historical Overview
Hinton, E., & Cook, D. (2021) · Annual Review of Criminology · doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-060520-033306 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
To Protect and to Serve: Police, Power, and the Production of Inequality in the United States
Felker-Kantor, M. (2024) · Crime and Justice · doi:10.1086/732194 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wiggins, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wiggins, Danielle
- Venue
- Journal of Urban History
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-01-30
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 711-727
- ISSN
- 0096-1442 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6771
- OpenAlex
- W2912288537
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 13
- FWCI
- 19.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Urban History (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Keywords
- order maintenance policing, broken windows theory, Black political leadership, foot patrol, crime control policy, post-Civil Rights era, urban crime, Atlanta, Black political culture, low-income communities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review