Cited by 16Chinese history and philosophyChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and GovernanceHistorical and Political Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Warlord, Social Welfare and Philanthropy: The Case of Guangzhou Under Chen Jitang, 1929-1936

Lin, Alfred H. Y.·2004·Modern China

Abstract

This study highlights the administration of social welfare and philanthropy in Guangzhou in the 1930s. It aims to elucidate three important points about state-society relationships under warlordism. First, a warlord could not afford to ignore the needs of society, for satisfying such needs (or at least making attempts to satisfy such needs) was vital to the credibility and survival of his regime. Second, a warlord would have little problem funding social welfare projects, for he always had recourse to extrabudgetary sources of revenue to finance desired undertakings. And third, the administration of social welfare and philanthropy by a warlord was an integral part of his drive toward total control of state and society. Indeed, care and control made up the two sides of a warlord’s strategy of governance: care laid the foundation of stable rule, whereas control served as the means to safeguard this foundation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0097700403261823

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. BENEDICT, CAROL (1996) Bubonic Plague in Nineteenth-Century China. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press. · DOI
  2. CHEN BAOZHI (1935) “Ershisinian shengzheng sheshi zhi huigu” (Review of facilities provided by the provincial administration in 1935). Xin Guangdong yuekan, no. 36: 1-39.
  3. CHEN JITANG ([1928] 1985) “Dangyuan xunlian de yiyi he mudi” (The significance and aims of training party members). Pp. 15-21 in Guangdongsheng dang’anguan (Guangdong Provincial Archives) (ed.), Chen Jitang yanjiu shiliao, 1928-1936 (Historical materials for research on Chen Jitang, 1928-1936). Guangzhou: Guangdongsheng dang’anguan.
  4. CHOA, G. H. (1990) “Heal the Sick” Was Their Motto: The Protestant Medical Missionaries in China. Hong Kong: Chinese Univ. Press.
  5. CUNNINGHAM, HUGH (1998) “Introduction.” Pp. 1-14 in Hugh Cunningham and Joanna Innes (eds.), Charity, Philanthropy, and Reform from the 1690s to 1850. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan. · DOI
  6. FITZGERALD, JOHN (1996) Awakening China: Politics, Culture, and Class in the Nationalist Revolution. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press. · DOI
  7. GILLIN, DONALD G. (1967) Warlord: Yen Hsi-shan in Shansi Province, 1911-1949. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. · DOI
  8. Guangdong Ren’ai shantang xuanhuabu [The Department of Edification of the Hall of Benevolence of Guangdong] (1935) Ren’ai xunkan (Journal of the Hall of Benevolence published every ten days). Guangzhou: Ren’ai shantang. Cited as RX.
  9. Guangdong Ren’ai shantang xuanhuabu [The Department of Edification of the Hall of Benevolence of Guangdong] (1935-1936) Ren’ai yuekan (Monthly journal of the Hall of Benevolence). Guangzhou: Ren’ai shantang. Cited as RY.
  10. LARY, DIANA (1974) Region and Nation: The Kwangsi Clique in Chinese Politics, 1925-1937. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  11. LEE, EDWARD BING-SHUEY (1936) Modern Canton. Shanghai: Mercury Press.
  12. LI TAIZAO (1935) “Shili yiyuan yewu zhi huigu yu qianzhan” (Review and forecast of the work of the Municipal Hospital). Guangzhou weisheng 1:93-99.
  13. LIANG GUOWU (1993) “Leizhou bandao feihuo jianwen” (What I saw and heard about banditry in the Leizhou peninsula). Pp. 89-101 in Hebei wenshi ziliao bianjibu (Hebei Historical Materials Editorial Department) (ed.), Jindai Zhongguo tufei shilu (True records of banditry in modern China). Vol. 3. Beijing: Qunzhong chubanshe.
  14. 10.1177/009770040202800202 · DOI
  15. OGILVIE, MARILYN BAILEY (1997) “The Rockefeller Foundation, China, Western medicine, and PUMC.” Pp. 21-37 in Soma Hewa and Philo Hove (eds.), Philanthropy and Cultural Context: Western Philanthropy in South, East, and Southeast Asia in the 20th Century. Lanham, MD: Univ. Press of America.
  16. RANKIN, MARY B. (1986) Elite Activism and Political Transformation in China: Zhejiang Province, 1865-1911. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
  17. RHOADS, EDWARD J. M. (1974) “Merchant Associations in Canton, 1895-1911.” Pp. 97-117 in Mark Elvin and G. William Skinner (eds.), The Chinese City between Two Worlds. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press. · DOI
  18. ROWE, WILLIAM T. (1984) Hankow: Commerce and Society in a Chinese City, 1796-1889. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
  19. ROWE, WILLIAM T. (1989) Hankow: Conflict and Community in a Chinese City, 1796-1895. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
  20. SHERIDAN, JAMES (1966) Chinese Warlord: The Career of Feng Yu-hsiang. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
  21. SUN YAT-SEN ([1924a] 1996) “Guomin zhengfu jianguo dagang” (Fundamentals of national reconstruction). Pp. 709-712 in Lingnan wenku bianji weiyuanhui (The Committee for the Compilation of Books on South China) and Guangdong zhonghua minzu wenhua cujinhui (The Guangdong Association for the Promotion of Chinese Culture) (eds.), Sun Zhongshan wencui(The essence of Sun Yat-sen’s writings). Shaoguan: Guangdong renmin chubanshe.
  22. SUN YAT-SEN ([1924b] 1996) “Minsheng zhuyi” (The principle of people’s livelihood). Pp. 928-1014 in Lingnan wenku bianji weiyuanhui (The Committee for the Compilation of Bookson South China) and Guangdong zhonghua minzu wenhua cujinhui (The Guangdong Association for the Promotion of Chinese Culture) (eds.), Sun Zhongshan wencui (The essence of Sun Yatsen’s writings). Shaoguan: Guangdong renmin chubanshe.
  23. TRESCOTT, PAUL B. (1997) “American philanthropy and the development of academic economics in China before 1949.” Pp. 157-181 in Soma Hewa and Philo Hove (eds.), Philanthropy and Cultural Context: Western Philanthropy in South, East, and Southeast Asia in the 20th Century. Lanham, MD: Univ. Press of America.
  24. TSIN, MICHAEL (1999) Nation, Governance, and Modernity in China: Canton, 1900-1927. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press. · DOI
  25. ZHANG, XIN (2000) Social Transformation in Modern China: The State and Local Elites in Henan, 1900-1937. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lin, A. H. Y.
Affiliations
University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Lin, Alfred H. Y.
Venue
Modern China
Published
2004-04
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
151-198
ISSN
  • 0097-7004 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6836
OpenAlex
W2064905587
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Modern China (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Historical and Political Studies
Keywords
warlordism, social welfare, philanthropy, state-society relations, Guangzhou, 1930s, regime legitimacy, social control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review