The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nutritional Approach in Malnourished Surgical Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study
Abstract
Hypothesis: Perioperative administration of a supplemented enteral formula may decrease postoperative morbidity. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Setting: Department of surgery at a university hospital. Patients: One hundred ninety‐six registered malnourished patients (weight loss > or = 10%) who were candidates for major elective surgery for malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract. Intervention: After randomization (n = 150), one group received postoperative enteral feeding with a standard diet within 12 hours of surgery (control group; n = 50). Another group orally received 1 L/d for 7 consecutive days of a liquid diet enriched with arginine, omega‐3 fatty acids, and RNA (preoperative group; n = 50). After surgery, patients were given the same standard enteral formula as the control group. A third group orally received 1 L/d for 7 consecutive days of the enriched liquid diet. After surgery, patients were given enteral feeding with the same enriched formula (perioperative group; n = 50). Main Outcome Measures: Postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. Results: The 3 groups were comparable for baseline demographics, biochemical markers, comorbidity factors, and surgical variables. The intent‐to‐treat analysis showed that the total number of patients with complications was 24 in the control group, 14 in the preoperative group, and 9 in the perioperative group (p = .02, control group versus perioperative group). Postoperative length of stay was significantly shorter in the preoperative (13.2 days) and perioperative (12.0 days) groups than in the control group (15.3 days) (p = .01 and p = .001, respectively, versus the control group). Conclusion: Perioperative immunonutrition seems to be the best approach to support malnourished patients with cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Surgery including Organ Transplantation
Weimann, A., Braga, M., Harsanyi, L., Laviano, A., Ljungqvist, O., Soeters, P., Jauch, K. W., Kemen, M., Hiesmayr, J. M., Horbach, T., et al. (2006) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2006.01.015 · Cited by 1,119
Self-citationAlves, A. (2005) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.140.3.278 · Cited by 532
Pre-operative Nutrition Support in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery.
Burden, S., Todd, C., Hill, J., & Lal, S. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008879.pub2 · Cited by 259
Barlow, R., Price, P., Reid, T. D., Hunt, S., Clark, G. W. B., Havard, T. J., Puntis, M. C. A., & Lewis, W. G. (2011) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2011.02.006 · Cited by 174
Lipids in the intensive care unit: Recommendations from the ESPEN Expert Group
Calder, P. C., Adolph, M., Deutz, N. E., Grau, T., Innes, J. K., Klek, S., Lev, S., Mayer, K., Michael-Titus, A. T., Pradelli, L., et al. (2018) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2017.08.032 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Braga, M., Gianotti, L., Nespoli, L., Radaelli, G., & Di Carlo, V
- Venue
- Nutrition in Clinical Practice
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 325-326
- ISSN
- 0884-5336 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-2452
- OpenAlex
- W1990440386
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutritional Approach in Malnourished Surgical Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0115426502017005325
- The paper
- Braga, M., Gianotti, L., Nespoli, L., Radaelli, G., & Di Carlo, V. (2002). Nutritional Approach in Malnourished Surgical Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study. Nutrition in Clinical Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/0115426502017005325
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.