Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 445

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Nutritional Approach in Malnourished Surgical Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study

Braga, M, Gianotti, L, Nespoli, L, Radaelli, G, Di Carlo, V·2002·Nutrition in Clinical Practice

Abstract

Hypothesis: Perioperative administration of a supplemented enteral formula may decrease postoperative morbidity. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Setting: Department of surgery at a university hospital. Patients: One hundred ninety‐six registered malnourished patients (weight loss > or = 10%) who were candidates for major elective surgery for malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract. Intervention: After randomization (n = 150), one group received postoperative enteral feeding with a standard diet within 12 hours of surgery (control group; n = 50). Another group orally received 1 L/d for 7 consecutive days of a liquid diet enriched with arginine, omega‐3 fatty acids, and RNA (preoperative group; n = 50). After surgery, patients were given the same standard enteral formula as the control group. A third group orally received 1 L/d for 7 consecutive days of the enriched liquid diet. After surgery, patients were given enteral feeding with the same enriched formula (perioperative group; n = 50). Main Outcome Measures: Postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. Results: The 3 groups were comparable for baseline demographics, biochemical markers, comorbidity factors, and surgical variables. The intent‐to‐treat analysis showed that the total number of patients with complications was 24 in the control group, 14 in the preoperative group, and 9 in the perioperative group (p = .02, control group versus perioperative group). Postoperative length of stay was significantly shorter in the preoperative (13.2 days) and perioperative (12.0 days) groups than in the control group (15.3 days) (p = .01 and p = .001, respectively, versus the control group). Conclusion: Perioperative immunonutrition seems to be the best approach to support malnourished patients with cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0115426502017005325

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 445

Metadata

Authors
Braga, M., Gianotti, L., Nespoli, L., Radaelli, G., & Di Carlo, V
Venue
Nutrition in Clinical Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-10
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
325-326
ISSN
  • 0884-5336 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-2452
OpenAlex
W1990440386
Cited by
445
References
0
FWCI
13.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutritional Approach in Malnourished Surgical Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0115426502017005325
The paper
Braga, M., Gianotti, L., Nespoli, L., Radaelli, G., & Di Carlo, V. (2002). Nutritional Approach in Malnourished Surgical Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study. Nutrition in Clinical Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/0115426502017005325

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.