The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Urgency of caesarean section: A new classification
Open accessAbstract
Summary: A new classification for caesarean section was developed in a two-part study conducted at six hospitals. Initially, 90 anaesthetists and obstetricians graded ten clinical scenarios according to five different classification methods—visual analogue scale; suitable anaesthetic technique; maximum time to delivery; clinical definitions; and a 1-5 rating scale. Clinical definitions was the most consistent and useful, and this method was then applied prospectively to 407 caesarean sections at the same six hospitals. There was close agreement (86%) between anaesthetists and obstetricians for the five-point scale (weighted kappa 0.89), increasing to 90% if two categories were combined (weighted kappa 0.91). We suggest that the resultant four-grade classification system—(i) immediate threat to life of woman or fetus; (ii) maternal or fetal compromise which is not immediately life-threatening; (iii) needing early delivery but no maternal or fetal compromise; (iv) at a time to suit the patient and maternity team—should be adopted by multidisciplinary groups with an interest in maternity data collection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Classifications for Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review
Torloni, M. R., Betran, A. P., Souza, J. P., Widmer, M., Allen, T., Gulmezoglu, M., & Merialdi, M. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014566 · Cited by 401
Fitzpatrick, K., Sellers, S., Spark, P., Kurinczuk, J., Brocklehurst, P., & Knight, M. (2014) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12405 · Cited by 357
Brocklehurst, P., Field, D., Greene, K., Juszczak, E., Keith, R., Kenyon, S., Linsell, L., Mabey, C., Newburn, M., Plachcinski, R., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30568-8 · Cited by 207
Time to consider the risks of caesarean delivery for long term child health
Blustein, J., & Liu, J. (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.h2410 · Cited by 125
Timing of caesarean section according to urgency
Leung, T. Y., & Lao, T. T. (2013) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.005 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Lucas, D. N., Yentis, S. M., Kinsella, S. M., Holdcroft, A., May, A. E., Wee, M., & Robinson, P. N.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 346-350
- ISSN
- 0141-0768 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-1095
- OpenAlex
- W1932980672
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Urgency of caesarean section: A new classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/014107680009300703
- The paper
- Lucas, D. N., Yentis, S. M., Kinsella, S. M., Holdcroft, A., May, A. E., Wee, M., & Robinson, P. N. (2000). Urgency of caesarean section: A new classification. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107680009300703
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.