Cited by 50Gastrointestinal motility and disordersPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research

Mechanisms and management of functional abdominal pain

Open access
Farmer, Adam D, Aziz, Qasim·2014·Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

Abstract

Functional abdominal pain syndrome is characterised by frequent or continuous abdominal pain associated with a degree of loss of daily activity. It has a reported population prevalence of between 0.5% and 1.7%, with a female preponderance. The pathophysiology of functional abdominal pain is incompletely understood although it has been postulated that peripheral sensitisation of visceral afferents, central sensitisation of the spinal dorsal horn and aberrancies within descending modulatory systems may have an important role. The management of patients with functional abdominal pain requires a tailored multidisciplinary approach in a supportive and empathetic environment in order to develop an effective therapeutic relationship. Patient education directed towards an explanation of the pathophysiology of functional abdominal pain is in our opinion a prerequisite step and provides the rationale for the introduction of interventions. Interventions can usefully be categorised into general measures, pharmacotherapy, psychological interventions and 'step-up' treatments. Pharmacotherapeutic/step-up options include tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors and the gabapentinoids. Psychological treatments include cognitive behavioural therapy and hypnotherapy. However, the objective evidence base for these interventions is largely derived from other chronic pain syndrome, and further research is warranted in adult patients with functional abdominal pain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0141076814540880

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies showed that distention of the gut resulted in activation of key pathways within the brain and that such pathways are exaggerated in disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome.

    “Studies showed that distention of the gut, resulted in activation of key pathways within the brain and that such pathways are exaggerated in disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), a functional GI disorder with dysregulated microbiota-gut-brain axis (Farmer and Aziz, 2014;Kennedy et al., 2014;Mayer, 2000).”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Farmer and Aziz, 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farmer, A. D., & Aziz, Q.
Affiliations
Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Farmer, Adam D
Venue
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Published
2014-09
Volume
107
Issue
9
Pages
347-354
ISSN
  • 0141-0768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1095
OpenAlex
W2012438553
Cited by
50
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Keywords
functional abdominal pain, pathophysiology, peripheral sensitization, central sensitization, descending pain modulation, multidisciplinary management, patient education, tricyclic antidepressants, gabapentinoids, cognitive behavioral therapy, hypnotherapy, chronic pain management
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Spinal Cord, Spinal Nerves, Syndrome, Abdominal Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review