Cited by 103

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk of individual malignant neoplasms in patients with sickle cell disease: English national record linkage study

Seminog, Olena O, Ogunlaja, Oyindamola I, Yeates, David, Goldacre, Michael J·2016·Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

Abstract

Objective: Case reports suggest that there may be an increased risk of some cancers associated with sickle cell disease. However, population-based studies are scarce and there is no comprehensive enumeration of the risks across the whole range of site-specific cancers. Our aim was to provide this. Design: We used an English national dataset of linked statistical records of hospital admissions and deaths from 1999 to 2011 to undertake a retrospective cohort study. Setting: England. Participants: Records of all hospital admissions in England with SCD or with conditions included in the control cohort. Main outcome measures: Rate ratios were calculated comparing rates of cancer in a sickle cell disease cohort and a control cohort, confining the analyses to people whose ethnicity was recorded as Black. Results: Comparing the sickle cell disease cohort with the cohort without sickle cell disease, the rate ratio for all cancers combined was 2.1 (95% confidence interval 1.7–2.5). There were significantly high rate ratios for haematological malignancies, including Hodgkin’s lymphoma (rate ratio 3.7, 1.5–8.4), non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (2.6, 1.3–4.8), multiple myeloma (5.5, 2.8–10.1), lymphoid leukaemia (3.3, 1.3–8.0) and myeloid leukaemia (10.0, 4.6–21.5). Four solid tumours showed elevated rate ratios: colon cancer (2.8, 1.2–5.5), non-melanoma skin cancer (4.4, 1.3–12.2), kidney cancer (5.4, 2.3–11.5) and thyroid cancer (5.1, 1.3–15.4). Conclusions: The risk of some malignancies may be raised in patients with sickle cell disease. However, this study was based on administrative data without the scope to validate these against patients’ full clinical records. Our findings need confirmation or refutation. If confirmed, work to elucidate, at the genetic and molecular level, why people with sickle cell disease have elevated risks of individual cancers might make contributions to the fundamental understanding of carcinogenesis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0141076816651037

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61029-X · DOI · Paper page
  2. National Health Service, NHS choices
  3. 10.1002/ajh.2830210212 · DOI
  4. Kim HS, 1998, West J Med, 169, 114
  5. 10.1080/1042819022386833 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/08880010701533637 · DOI
  7. 10.5858/2005-129-423-CMLISC · DOI
  8. 10.1002/ajh.10427 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8652(199707)55:4<188::AID-AJH4>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
  10. 10.1093/qjmed/93.10.669 · DOI
  11. 10.1136/adc.2003.046219 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/cge.12010 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/bjc.2012.535 · DOI
  14. Saunders CL, 2013, BMJ Open, 28, 3
  15. Breslow NE, 1987, The Design and Analysis of Cohort Studies, 103
  16. 10.1097/01.ju.0000158448.56888.09 · DOI
  17. 10.1097/01.coc.0000037663.61643.5A · DOI
  18. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-14-0028 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/mic.11.2.129.151 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s002770000173 · DOI
  21. 10.1182/blood.V93.11.3824 · DOI
  22. 10.1056/NEJM200308283490921 · DOI
  23. Steinberg MH, 2010, Am J Hematol, 85, 403, 10.1002/ajh.21699 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1002/pbc.23365 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/bjc.2011.168 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Seminog, O. O., Ogunlaja, O. I., Yeates, D., & Goldacre, M. J.
Venue
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Published
2016-07-21
Volume
109
Issue
8
Pages
303-309
ISSN
  • 0141-0768
  • 1758-1095
Cited by
103
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review