Cited by 19Biblical Studies and InterpretationReligion, Theology, History, Judaism, ChristianityKarl Barth and Christian Theology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

‘Who Can Forgive Sins but God Alone?’ Human and Angelic Agents, and Divine Forgiveness in Early Judaism

Johansson, Daniel·2011·Journal for the Study of the New Testament

Abstract

Was forgiveness of sins viewed as a divine prerogative, uniquely reserved for the God of Israel in early Judaism? While some scholars think this was the case, others have questioned or qualified such a view, arguing that other figures, such as priests, prophets, various messianic figures, or angels, could forgive sins in the place of God. This article surveys and critiques the main evidence that has been put forward to demonstrate this. The outcome is mainly negative. With the possible exception of one or two passages which may ascribe the authority to pardon sin to the Angel of YHWH, no firm evidence can be found which demonstrates that other figures than God forgave sins. Various strands of early Judaism conceived of human and angelic agents who interceded on behalf of others, expiated sin and mediated forgiveness from God, but they all seem to have shared the view that forgiveness is divine prerogative.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0142064x11404601

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. 10.1515/9783110923971 · DOI
  2. Andersen, F.I., 2000, Micah: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary (AB, 24E;, 10.5040/9780300261585 · DOI
  3. Baumgarten, J.M., Provo International Conference on the Dead Sea Scrolls
  4. Begg, C.T., 2005, Flavius Josephus: Translation and Commentary. IV. Flavius Josephus Judean Antiquities 5-7
  5. 10.1017/S0028688500008900 · DOI
  6. Beyer, K., 1984, Die aramäischen Texten vom Toten Meer
  7. Black, M., 1967, An Aramaic Approach to the Gospels and Acts
  8. Blackburn, B., 1991, WUNT, 2
  9. Broadhead, E.K., 1999, Naming Jesus: Titular Christology in the Gospel of Mark (JSNTSup, 175;
  10. 2001, Mark
  11. Charlesworth, J.H. (ed.) 1995 The Dead Sea Scrolls: Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek Texts with English Translations. II. Damascus Document, War Scroll, and Related Documents ( Tübingen: Mohr [Siebeck ]).
  12. Chilton, B.D., 1987, The Aramaic Bible. XI. The Isaiah Targum: Introduction, Translation, Apparatus and Notes
  13. Collins, J.J., 1996, DJD, 83
  14. Cross, F.M., 1984, IEJ, 34, 260
  15. Dalman, G., 1898, Die Worte Jesu: Band I
  16. Dunn, J.D.G., 1992, The Parting of the Ways: Between Christianity and Judaism and their Significance for the Character of Christianity
  17. Dupont-Sommer, A., Congress Volume
  18. Durham, J.I., 1987, Exodus (WBC;
  19. Fitzmyer, J., 1980, JBL, 99, 5
  20. Fletcher-Louis, C.H.T., 2007, JSHJ, 5, 57
  21. Flint, P.W. 1997 ‘The Daniel Tradition at Qumran’, in C.A. Evans and P.W. Flint (eds.), Eschatology, Messianism and the Dead Sea Scrolls (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans): 41-60.
  22. 2001, VTSup, 2, II
  23. Friedrich, G., 1956, ZTK, 53, 265
  24. García Martínez, F., 1992, Qumran and Apocalyptic: Studies on the Aramaic Texts from Qumran, 9, 116
  25. 1994, The Dead Sea Scrolls Translated: The Qumran Texts in English
  26. 10.1163/9789004332447 · DOI
  27. Goppelt, L., 1975, Theologie des Neuen Testaments
  28. Grelot, P., 1978, RevQ, 9, 483
  29. Grundmann, W., 1959, Das Evangelium nach Markus
  30. Gundry, R.H., 1993, Mark: A Commentary on his Apology for the Cross
  31. 10.1515/9783111342962 · DOI
  32. Hägerland, T., 2009, PhD dissertation
  33. Henze, M., 1999, The Madness of Nebuchadnezzar: The Ancient Near Eastern Origins and Early History of Interpretation of Daniel 4 (JSJSup, 61;, 10.1163/9789004493759 · DOI
  34. Hofius, O., 2000, Neutestamentliche Studien, 132, 38
  35. 2000, Neutestamentliche Studien, 132, 57
  36. 2000, Neutestamentliche Studien, 132, 70
  37. Hollander, H.W., 1985, The Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs: A Commentary
  38. 10.13109/9783666539220 · DOI
  39. Janowski, B., 1993, Gegenwart in Israel: Beiträge zur Theologie des Alten Testaments, 40
  40. Jonge, M. de, 1953, The Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs: A Study of their Text, Composition and Origin
  41. Jongeling, B., 1976, SSS, 4
  42. Keil, C.F., 2001, The Minor Prophets
  43. Kellermann, U. 1993 ‘Wer kann Sünden vergeben ausser Elia?’ , in P. Mommer et al. (eds.), Gottes Recht als Lebensraum (FS H.J. Boecker; Neukirchen-Vluyn : Neukirchener Verlag): 165-77.
  44. Klauck, H.-J., 1981, BZ, 25, 223, 10.30965/25890468-02502004 · DOI
  45. Koch, K., 1966, EvT, 26, 217
  46. 1972, JSJ, 3, 117, 10.1163/157006372X00027 · DOI
  47. Kraus, H.-J., 1993, Psalms 1-59 (trans. H.C. Oswald;
  48. 1993 b Psalms 60-150 (trans. H.C. Oswald; Minneapolis : Fortress Press).
  49. Kuhn, H.-W., 1971, Ältere Sammlungen im Markusevangelium
  50. Lohmeyer, E., 1937, Das Evangelium des Markus (KEK;
  51. Marcus, J., 1994, JSNTSup, 104, 196
  52. McCarter, P.K., 1984, II Samuel: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary (AB, 9;, 10.5040/9780300261202 · DOI
  53. Meyer, R., 1962, Das Gebet des Nabonid: Eine in den Qumran-Handschriften wiederentdeckte Weisheitserzählung, 10.1515/9783112701294 · DOI
  54. Meyers, C.L., 1987, Haggai, Zechariah 1-8 (AB, 25B;
  55. Milik, J.T., 1956, RB, 63, 407
  56. 10.4159/harvard.9780674289567 · DOI
  57. 10.1093/jts/XXIX.2.495 · DOI
  58. Nickelsburg, G.W.E. 1984 ‘Stories of Biblical and Early Post-Biblical Times’ , in M.E. Stone (ed.), Jewish Writings of the Second Temple Period: Apocalyptic, Pseudepigrapha, Qumran Sectarian Writings, Philo, Josephus (Assen: Van Gorcum): 33-87. · DOI
  59. Petersen, D.L., 1984, Haggai and Zechariah 1-8: A Commentary (OTL;
  60. Puech, É., 1996, JSOTSup, 230, 208
  61. Rad, G. von, 1961, Gesammelte Studien zum Alten Testament
  62. Sanders, E.P., 1992, Judaism: Practice and Belief 63 BCE-66 CE
  63. Schmidt, F., 1986, TSAJ, 11
  64. Segal, A.F., 1977, Two Powers in Heaven: Early Rabbinic Reports about Christianity and Gnosticism (SJLA, 25;, 10.1163/9789004667488 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Steinmann, A., 2002, RevQ, 20, 557
  66. 10.13109/9783666532115 · DOI
  67. Tsumara D.T., 2007, The First Book of Samuel (NICOT;, 10.5040/bci-008q · DOI
  68. Tuckett, C.M., 1982, JSNT, 4, 58
  69. Vermes, G., 1973, Jesus the Jew: A Historian’s Reading of the Gospels
  70. 1990, The Dead Sea Scrolls in English
  71. Waltke, B.K., 2007, A Commentary on Micah
  72. Weiss, J., 1892, Die Predigt Jesu vom Reiche Gottes
  73. Woude, A.S. van der, 1978, BETL, 46, 121

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Johansson, D.
Affiliations
Stenbrogatan 3E, 431 43 Molndal, Sweden,
Corresponding author
Johansson, Daniel
Venue
Journal for the Study of the New Testament
Published
2011-06
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
351-374
ISSN
  • 0142-064X (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-5294
OpenAlex
W2042653512
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
42.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal for the Study of the New Testament (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Karl Barth and Christian Theology
Keywords
divine forgiveness, sin, early Judaism, angels, intercession, mediation, priests, prophets, messianic figure, expiation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review