Cited by 51Language Development and DisordersSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationChild and Animal Learning Development

Italian children's use of verb and noun morphology during the preschool years

Leonard, Laurence B., Caselli, M. Cristina, Devescovi, Antonella·2002·First Language

Abstract

Five groups of Italian-speaking children ages 2 to 7 years participated in tasks designed to assess their use of a range of grammatical morphemes. Present tense verb inflections and noun plural inflections reached ceiling levels by 4 years of age, whereas present tense copula forms and definite singular articles showed high accuracy levels by 5 years of age. Errors on present tense inflections were rarely infinitives. Instead, most errors could be characterized as ‘near misses’ – productions of forms that differed from the target by a single feature of person or number. Many of these one-feature errors were directional; first person forms were more likely to be replaced by third person forms than the reverse, and plural forms were more likely to be substituted by singular forms than the opposite pattern. Errors of this type are not handled by models of grammatical development that deal with broader constructs such as the availability or optionality of tense or finiteness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/014272370202206604

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clear effects of input frequency on correct use in inflectional morphology are found in both naturalistic and experimental studies.

    “When this prediction is tested, clear effects of input frequency are found, in both naturalistic (e.g. Theakston, Lieven, Pine & Rowland, 2005; Theakston & Lieven, 2005, 2008; Theakston & Rowland, 2009) and experimental studies (e.g. Leonard, Caselli & Devescovi, 2002; Dabrowska & Szczerbinski, 2006; Räsänen, Ambridge & Pine, 2014).”

    From The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition (2015) · cites this paper as Leonard, Caselli & Devescovi, 2002

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 51

Authors
Leonard, L. B., Caselli, M. C., & Devescovi, A.
Affiliations
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies (IT)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Leonard, Laurence B.
  • Caselli, M. Cristina
  • Devescovi, Antonella
Venue
First Language
Published
2002-10
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
287-304
ISSN
  • 0142-7237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-2344
OpenAlex
W1542647869
Cited by
51
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 20 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
First Language (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
Italian language, verb inflection, copulas, definite article, preschool children, grammatical errors, near misses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review