Examination Anxiety: Live With It, Control It Or Make It Work For You?
Abstract
This research investigated factors affecting examination anxiety and aimed to increase schools’ understanding of this topic. The study was a school-based initiative, evaluating intervention strategies to help secondary pupils with the self-management of their examination anxiety. The study compared the effects of a range of approaches on participants’ performance in the GCSE (General Certificate of Secondary Education) examinations, on their self-reported examination anxiety and on their behaviour. Intervention strategies had previously been trialled in a smaller group pilot study. Data suggest that interventions using cognitive behavioural approaches combined with relaxation helped pupils to improve their examination performance in Maths. Findings also suggest an interaction between pre-anxiety level and performance, suggesting that it is not minimal, but optimal anxiety which leads to better examination performance. Results encourage the view that school-based programmes using mixed interventions may be effective in the prevention of excessive examination anxiety and in the improvement of examination performance if compared to single interventions, but show variations depending on the curriculum subject. There is evidence from the literature that Maths anxiety in particular may have considerable life impact, and that levels of Maths anxiety have been shown to predict later career choices in American adolescents.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CBT interventions reduce social and test anxiety.
“For example, several studies point out that Cognitive and Behavioral Therapy (CBT) interventions reduce social and test anxiety (de Hullu et al., 2017; Fayand et al., 2013; Gregor, 2005; Tunç & Karaburç, 2017), while also noting that cognitive techniques reduce test anxiety without behavioral techniques.”
From Reducing Test Anxiety During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (2024) · cites this paper as Gregor, 2005
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 112
- Authors
- Gregor, A.
- Corresponding author
- Gregor, Astrid
- Venue
- School Psychology International
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 617-635
- ISSN
- 0143-0343 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7374
- OpenAlex
- W1973672426
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- School Psychology International (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University College London
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- test anxiety, high school students, GCSE examinations, exam performance, cognitive-behavioural intervention, relaxation techniques, self-management, mathematics anxiety, school-based intervention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review