Readying students to test: The influence of fear and efficacy appeals on anxiety and test performance
Abstract
Educational accountability policies have led to a growth in the use of high-stakes examinations for a number of important educational decisions, including the evaluation of teacher effectiveness. As such, educators are under increasing pressure to raise student test performance. In an attempt to prepare students for a high-stakes exam, teachers often resort to using threat-based messages that focus on the negative consequences of test failure rather than messages highlighting students’ ability or expectation for high performance. However, the relative influence of teacher messaging (threat-based or facilitating) under different testing conditions is unknown. The present investigation examined the use of fear and efficacy appeals with 487 university students. Anxiety, motivation, and test performance data were collected during a typical, lower stakes testing situation and a higher-stakes, final course examination. A two-way mixed ANOVA and a mediation analysis were used to examine between (i.e. fear and efficacy appeals) and within (i.e. different testing conditions) subject factors. Results suggest that fear appeals significantly harm student test performance relative to efficacy appeals, even when controlling for the impact of intrinsic motivation on test anxiety. Contrary to prediction, student anxiety did not appear to explain the relationship between fear appeals and lowered test performance. The potential implications of findings are discussed, including the importance of instructional context with regards to teacher instructional practices and student success.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent studies have shown negative consequences of using test scores to evaluate teachers, including increased teacher stress and student anxiety.
“Recent studies have also shown negative consequences with using test scores to evaluate teachers, including increased teacher stress and student anxiety (von der Embse et al., 2015; Putwain, 2008; Saeki et al., 2015).”
From Teacher stress and supports, classroom practices and student outcomes in high poverty urban elementary schools (2024) · cites this paper as von der Embse et al., 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- von der Embse, N. P., Schultz, B. K., & Draughn, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Temple University, USA
- East Carolina University (US)
- ORCID
- Schultz, Brandon K.
- Venue
- School Psychology International
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-11-20
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 620-637
- ISSN
- 0143-0343 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7374
- OpenAlex
- W2341302782
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 8.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- School Psychology International (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Keywords
- fear appeals, test anxiety, test performance, high-stakes testing, intrinsic motivation, university students, educational accountability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review