Cited by 333Behavioral Health and InterventionsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSmoking Behavior and Cessation

Stages of Change: A Critique

Littell, Julia H., Girvin, Heather·2002·Behavior Modification

Abstract

The stages of change proposed by Prochaska and DiClemente have been applied to change efforts within and outside of formal treatment and in relation to virtually any problem behavior. This model has gained widespread popularity in health psychology and addictions and is being used to guide interventions and allocate treatment resources in several fields. In this article, the authors review 87 studies on the stages of change across problem behaviors. Research findings suggest that the proposed stages are not mutually exclusive and that there is scant evidence of sequential movement through discrete stages in studies of specific problem behaviors, such as smoking and substance abuse. Although the stage model may have considerable heuristic value, its practical utility is limited by concerns about the validity of stage assessments. The model's underlying concepts and alternative views of readiness for change are considered, along with directions for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0145445502026002006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study focused on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as a better-matched model of behavior change within the current context, rather than the Transtheoretical Model.

    “We thus focused on the TPB as a better-matched model of behavior change within the current context.”
  • Research has challenged the validity of sequential movement through the Transtheoretical Model stages.

    “However, research has challenged the validity of sequential movement through the TTM stages (e.g.,Littell and Girvin, 2002), including relevant previous studies(Buckner and Schmidt, 2009; Maltby and Tolin's, 2007) that found group differences in treatment-seeking behavior in the absence of differences in TTM stages.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 109 · Cited by 333

Authors
Littell, J. H., & Girvin, H.
Affiliations
  • .
  • Bryn Mawr College (US)
Corresponding author
  • Littell, Julia H.
  • Girvin, Heather
Venue
Behavior Modification
Published
2002-04
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
223-273
ISSN
  • 0145-4455 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4167
OpenAlex
W2157688071
Cited by
333
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 22
FWCI
28.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Modification (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
stages of change, transtheoretical model, readiness to change, smoking cessation, addiction treatment, health behavior interventions
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Behavior Therapy, Humans, Motivation, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Health Behavior, Smoking Cessation, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review