Stages of Change: A Critique
Abstract
The stages of change proposed by Prochaska and DiClemente have been applied to change efforts within and outside of formal treatment and in relation to virtually any problem behavior. This model has gained widespread popularity in health psychology and addictions and is being used to guide interventions and allocate treatment resources in several fields. In this article, the authors review 87 studies on the stages of change across problem behaviors. Research findings suggest that the proposed stages are not mutually exclusive and that there is scant evidence of sequential movement through discrete stages in studies of specific problem behaviors, such as smoking and substance abuse. Although the stage model may have considerable heuristic value, its practical utility is limited by concerns about the validity of stage assessments. The model's underlying concepts and alternative views of readiness for change are considered, along with directions for future research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The study focused on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as a better-matched model of behavior change within the current context, rather than the Transtheoretical Model.
“We thus focused on the TPB as a better-matched model of behavior change within the current context.”
From A Randomized Trial of Brief Online Interventions to Facilitate Treatment Seeking for Social Anxiety. (2022) · cites this paper as Littell and Girvin, 2002
Research has challenged the validity of sequential movement through the Transtheoretical Model stages.
“However, research has challenged the validity of sequential movement through the TTM stages (e.g.,Littell and Girvin, 2002), including relevant previous studies(Buckner and Schmidt, 2009; Maltby and Tolin's, 2007) that found group differences in treatment-seeking behavior in the absence of differences in TTM stages.”
From A Randomized Trial of Brief Online Interventions to Facilitate Treatment Seeking for Social Anxiety. (2022) · cites this paper as Littell and Girvin, 2002
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 109 · Cited by 333
- Authors
- Littell, J. H., & Girvin, H.
- Affiliations
- .
- Bryn Mawr College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Littell, Julia H.
- Girvin, Heather
- ORCID
- Littell, Julia H.
- Venue
- Behavior Modification
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 223-273
- ISSN
- 0145-4455 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4167
- OpenAlex
- W2157688071
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 109
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 28.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavior Modification (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Keywords
- stages of change, transtheoretical model, readiness to change, smoking cessation, addiction treatment, health behavior interventions
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Behavior Therapy, Humans, Motivation, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Health Behavior, Smoking Cessation, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review