Use of the Talking Tactile Tablet in Mathematics Testing
Abstract
This article describes an experimental system for administering multiple-choice math tests to students who are visually impaired or otherwise print disabled. Using a new audio-tactile computer peripheral device called the Talking Tactile Tablet, the authors created a preliminary version of a self-voicing test that included 12 items, all of which referred to a graphical element. Users could take the test, working through the items at their own speed and learning about associated tactile graphic diagrams by pressing on various features to hear appropriate audio descriptions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adding interactivity to tactile graphics through diverse technologies has led to improvements such as better content exploration, learning facilitation, and expansion of information provided without over-complications.
“Some of the improvements are better content exploration [18], learning facilitation [19], and expansion of the amount of information provided without over-complications [20].”
From Accessible Visual Artworks for Blind and Visually Impaired People: Comparing a Multimodal Approach with Tactile Graphics (2021) · cites this paper as [19]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Usability of Accessible Bar Charts
Goncu, C., Marriott, K., & Hurst, J. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14600-8_17 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Landau, S., Russell, M., Gourgey, K., Erin, J. N., & Cowan, J.
- Affiliations
- Touch Graphics (United States) (US)
- Boston College (US)
- Baruch College (US)
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Russell, Michael
- Gourgey, Karen
- Erin, Jane N.
- Cowan, Jennifer
- ORCID
- Russell, Michael
- Venue
- Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 85-96
- ISSN
- 0145-482X (ISSN-L)
- 1559-1476
- OpenAlex
- W240887194
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 6.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Keywords
- tactile graphics, audio description, visually impaired students, assistive technology, peripheral devices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review