The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Quality, Importance, and Instruction: The Perspectives of Teachers of Students with Visual Impairments on Graphics Use by Students
Abstract
Introduction This study investigated the perceptions and practices of teachers of students with visual impairments in Canada and the United States regarding graphics (both tactile and print) that are used by students with visual impairments. Questions focused on quality, importance, and instruction in the use of graphics. Methods An electronic survey was disseminated. Results were summarized by percentage, based on the number of respondents who answered each question. Parallel questions that compared responses for tactile versus print graphics were statistically compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and effect sizes were computed. Results In general, teachers valued the use of graphics and the need to provide instruction. Significant differences were found in how teachers answered tactile and print graphic questions. Fewer than 50% of the respondents felt that graphics were appropriately adapted on large-scale assessments, that there was sufficient instruction in the use of graphics in mainstream classrooms, or that there was an adequate amount of instructional time to teach the use of graphics. Discussion Findings highlighted a need to gain insight into effective teaching strategies that help students gather information from both tactile and print graphics. Attention to students with low vision using print graphics needs to be part of future investigations. Implications for practitioners Advocacy for sufficient instruction time for graphics and continued monitoring o…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Without alt text, people with accessibility needs face significant challenges, such as understanding the visual content in academic materials.
“Without alt text, people with accessibility needs face significant challenges [22, 69], such as understanding the visual content in academic materials [37, 88, 90].”
From How University Disability Services Professionals Write Image Descriptions for HCI Figures Using Generative AI (2026) · cites this paper as [88]
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 17 · Cited by 44
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Allman C., 2009, Test access: Making tests accessible for students with visual impairments: A guide for test publishers, test developers, and state assessment personnel
- 10.1016/j.asr.2007.05.080 · DOI
- Bentzen B. L., 1979, Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 73, 264, 10.1177/0145482X7907300702 · DOI
- 10.1016/0745-7138(92)90044-6 · DOI
- Conover W. J., 1999, Practical nonparametric statistics
- 10.1177/0145482X0309700502 · DOI
- 10.1177/0145482X0209600503 · DOI
- Hatlen P., 1996, RE:view, 28, 25
- 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02012.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0264619606063402 · DOI
- 10.1177/0145482X0309700603 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bjoms.2007.09.002 · DOI
- Pallant J., 2010, SPSS survival manual
- 10.1177/0145482X1110500703 · DOI
- 10.1177/0145482X1210600603 · DOI
- 10.1177/026461960101900303 · DOI
- 10.1177/0145482X1210600905 · DOI
- 10.1177/0145482X0209600403 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Zebehazy, K. T., & Wilton, A. P.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Zebehazy, Kim T.
- Wilton, Adam P.
- ORCID
- Zebehazy, Kim T.
- Venue
- Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-16
- ISSN
- 0145-482X (ISSN-L)
- 1559-1476
- OpenAlex
- W191813788
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 5.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
- Keywords
- visual impairment, tactile graphics, print graphics, teacher perceptions, low vision, visually impaired students, mainstream classrooms, instructional time, teaching materials
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review