Cited by 44Disability Education and EmploymentTactile and Sensory InteractionsOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Quality, Importance, and Instruction: The Perspectives of Teachers of Students with Visual Impairments on Graphics Use by Students

Zebehazy, Kim T., Wilton, Adam P.·2014·Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness

Abstract

Introduction This study investigated the perceptions and practices of teachers of students with visual impairments in Canada and the United States regarding graphics (both tactile and print) that are used by students with visual impairments. Questions focused on quality, importance, and instruction in the use of graphics. Methods An electronic survey was disseminated. Results were summarized by percentage, based on the number of respondents who answered each question. Parallel questions that compared responses for tactile versus print graphics were statistically compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and effect sizes were computed. Results In general, teachers valued the use of graphics and the need to provide instruction. Significant differences were found in how teachers answered tactile and print graphic questions. Fewer than 50% of the respondents felt that graphics were appropriately adapted on large-scale assessments, that there was sufficient instruction in the use of graphics in mainstream classrooms, or that there was an adequate amount of instructional time to teach the use of graphics. Discussion Findings highlighted a need to gain insight into effective teaching strategies that help students gather information from both tactile and print graphics. Attention to students with low vision using print graphics needs to be part of future investigations. Implications for practitioners Advocacy for sufficient instruction time for graphics and continued monitoring o…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0145482x1410800102

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 17 · Cited by 44

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Allman C., 2009, Test access: Making tests accessible for students with visual impairments: A guide for test publishers, test developers, and state assessment personnel
  2. 10.1016/j.asr.2007.05.080 · DOI
  3. Bentzen B. L., 1979, Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 73, 264, 10.1177/0145482X7907300702 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0745-7138(92)90044-6 · DOI
  5. Conover W. J., 1999, Practical nonparametric statistics
  6. 10.1177/0145482X0309700502 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/0145482X0209600503 · DOI
  8. Hatlen P., 1996, RE:view, 28, 25
  9. 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02012.x · DOI
  10. 10.1177/0264619606063402 · DOI
  11. 10.1177/0145482X0309700603 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.bjoms.2007.09.002 · DOI
  13. Pallant J., 2010, SPSS survival manual
  14. 10.1177/0145482X1110500703 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/0145482X1210600603 · DOI
  16. 10.1177/026461960101900303 · DOI
  17. 10.1177/0145482X1210600905 · DOI
  18. 10.1177/0145482X0209600403 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Zebehazy, K. T., & Wilton, A. P.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Zebehazy, Kim T.
  • Wilton, Adam P.
Venue
Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness
Published
2014-01
Volume
108
Issue
1
Pages
5-16
ISSN
  • 0145-482X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1476
OpenAlex
W191813788
Cited by
44
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
5.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Keywords
visual impairment, tactile graphics, print graphics, teacher perceptions, low vision, visually impaired students, mainstream classrooms, instructional time, teaching materials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review