The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
A Humanistic and Futuristic Approach to Sex Education for Blind Children
Abstract
Sex education programs for blind children must take into account the sexual negativism of American culture and work to overcome resistance to the use of touch so necessary to learning by blind children. Full access to the sexual culture needs to be made available to blind children through ending the censorship of sex-oriented literature. Both teachers and parents need a great deal of help in overcoming their own insecurities about sexuality so that they can better educate their children in this crucial area.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Torbett, D. S.
- Affiliations
- Temple Buell College, Denver, is now with the Family Enrichment Center, also in Denver.
- Corresponding author
- Torbett, David S.
- Venue
- Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1974-05
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 210-215
- ISSN
- 0145-482X (ISSN-L)
- 1559-1476
- OpenAlex
- W149019788
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
- Keywords
- sex education, blind children, tactile learning, touch, humanistic education, future-oriented education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review