Cited by 29Ear Surgery and Otitis MediaEar and Head TumorsHearing Loss and Rehabilitation

Nonsurgical home treatment of middle ear effusion and associated hearing loss in children. Part I: clinical trial

Arick, Daniel S., Silman, Shlomo·2005·Ear, Nose & Throat Journal

Abstract

We conducted a randomized, controlled clinical trial to investigate the efficacy of treatment of persistent middle ear effusion (MEE) and associated hearing loss with a modified Politzer device used in the home setting over a 7-week period. Efficacy was determined by comparing pre-and posttherapy air-conduction thresholds, tympanometric peak pressures, and otoscopic findings. The study group was made up of 94 children (174 ears), aged 4 to 11 years, who had at least a 2-month history of MEE and associated hearing loss. At study's end, patients in the treatment group experienced statistically significant improvements in all measured outcomes; no significant improvements were seen in the control group in all measured outcomes. At study's end, the hearing sensitivity of 73.9% of the treated ears was within normal limits, compared with only 26.7% of the control ears. These findings demonstrate that home treatment of children with persistent MEE and associated hearing loss with the modified Politzer device is highly efficacious.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/014556130508400911

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Arick 2005, complete compliance was achieved in 46 of 47 experimental patients (97.9%).

    “Complete compliance in 46 of 47 ex- perimental patients (97.9%), moder- ate compliance in remaining patient”

    From Autoinflation for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children (2023) · cites this paper as Arick 2005

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arick, D. S., & Silman, S.
Affiliations
  • New York Eye and Ear Infirmary (US)
  • City University of New York (US)
Venue
Ear, Nose & Throat Journal
Published
2005-09
Volume
84
Issue
9
Pages
567-578
ISSN
  • 0145-5613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-7522
OpenAlex
W35652691
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ear Nose & Throat Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r44dc003613-03)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (5R44DC003613-03)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Ear and Head Tumors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Keywords
middle ear effusion, otitis media with effusion, hearing loss, home treatment, conservative treatment, children, air conduction thresholds, tympanometry, otoscopy, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Acoustic Impedance Tests, Air Pressure, Audiometry, Pure-Tone, Auditory Threshold, Child, Child, Preschool, Eustachian Tube, Hearing Loss, Conductive, Humans, Insufflation, Nose, Otitis Media with Effusion, Otolaryngology, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review