Clinical Inertia Contributes to Poor Diabetes Control in a Primary Care Setting
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine whether "clinical inertia"-inadequate intensification of therapy by the provider-could contribute to high A1C levels in patients with type 2 diabetes managed in a primary care site. Methods In a prospective observational study, management was compared in the Medical Clinic, a primary care site supervised by general internal medicine faculty, and the Diabetes Clinic, a specialty site supervised by endocrinologists. These municipal hospital clinics serve a common population that is largely African American, poor, and uninsured. Results Four hundred thirty-eight African American patients in the Medical Clinic and 2157 in the Diabetes Clinic were similar in average age, diabetes duration, body mass index, and gender, but A1C averaged 8.6% in the Medical Clinic versus 7.7% in the Diabetes Clinic (P Conclusions Medical Clinic patients had worse glycemic control, were less likely to be treated with insulin, and were less likely to have their therapy intensified if glucose levels were elevated. To improve diabetes management and glycemic control nationwide, physicians in training and generalists must learn to overcome clinical inertia, to intensify therapy when appropriate, and to use insulin when clinically indicated.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The review found two conflicting results: Lang et al. reported that patients with worse glycemic control and those whose therapy was initiated by a diabetologist experienced more clinical inertia, whereas Ziemer et al. reported less clinical inertia at the diabetes clinic (35%) versus the medical clinic (67%).
“The review also came across two conflicting results, where Lang et al. reported that the patients with worse glycemic control and those whose therapy was initiated by a diabetologist experienced more clinical inertia [21], which contrasted with what Ziemer et al. reported, which was less clinical inertia at the diabetes clinic (35%) versus the medical clinic (67%) [43].”
From Clinical Inertia in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [43]
In the USA, patients treated at a diabetes clinic or specialist clinic experienced less clinical inertia than those managed at a medical clinic.
“On the contrary, in the USA, Ziemer et al. [43] reported that patients who were treated at a diabetes clinic (or specialist clinic) experienced less clinical inertia than those who were managed at medical clinic.”
From Clinical Inertia in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [43]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 25 · Cited by 208
- Authors
- Ziemer, D. C., Miller, C. D., Rhee, M. K., Doyle, J. P., Watkins, C., Cook, C. B., Gallina, D. L., El-Kebbi, I. M., Barnes, C. S., Dunbar, V. G., Branch, W. T., & Phillips, L. S.
- Affiliations
- Grady Memorial Hospital (US)
- Divisions of Endocrinology and Metabolism and General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Grady Health Systems, Atlanta, Georgia
- Venue
- The Diabetes Educator
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 564-571
- ISSN
- 0145-7217 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-6063
- OpenAlex
- W2144611099
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 6.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HS 07922)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK0-66204, DK062668, DK07298, F32DK062668, R18DK066204)
- National Center for Research Resources (RR00039, RR017643, K12RR017643)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Keywords
- clinical inertia, type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, HbA1c, insulin therapy, primary care, African American patients, uninsured patients, low-income patients, general internal medicine, endocrinology
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Patient Compliance, Primary Health Care, Quality Assurance, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review