CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 122Diabetes Management and EducationMedication Adherence and ComplianceBehavioral Health and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How Are Adherent People More Likely to Think? A Meta-Analysis of Health Beliefs and Diabetes Self-Care

Gherman, Amfiana, Schnur, Julie, Montgomery, Guy, Sassu, Raluca, Veresiu, Ioan, David, Daniel·2011·The Diabetes Educator
DOI 10.1177/0145721711403012
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose Diabetes is increasingly prevalent, and nonadherence with diabetes treatment regimens is associated with physical and social costs. Psychological predictors of adherence have been investigated in the literature, including cognitive factors. The present meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the association between beliefs related to diabetes and adherence to diabetes regimens. Methods Studies that measured both (a) beliefs, perceptions, or cognitions about diabetes and (b) the relationship between such cognitive factors and blood glucose levels or other adherence behaviors were included. This research focused on adults with any type of diabetes, reaching a final sample of 48 studies. The effect size r was calculated for all types of beliefs and outcomes. Results The types of beliefs most strongly associated with adherence were self-efficacy, perceiving a positive relationship with physician, and beliefs about the personal consequences of adherence. A few limitations of this meta-analysis are that studies were only retrieved through databases and other sources were not searched, only articles in English were included, and only adult participants were included. Conclusions People who are more adherent have a higher level of confidence in their ability to follow medical recommendations, expect more meaningful positive consequences for adherence, and perceive a more positive relationship with their health care provider. Educators and clinicians could use cognitive restructuring techniques to facilitate these types of beliefs and perceptions in people with diabetes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0145721711403012

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 68 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Borenstein M, 2005, Comprehensive Meta-analysis Version 2
  2. Barnes L, 2004, N Z Med J, 117, 1
  3. Daniel M, 2002, Chronic Dis Can, 23, 130

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Gherman, A., Schnur, J., Montgomery, G., Sassu, R., Veresiu, I., & David, D.
Affiliations
  • Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu (RO)
ORCID
Venue
The Diabetes Educator
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2011-04-08
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
392-408
ISSN
  • 0145-7217 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-6063
DOI
10.1177/0145721711403012
OpenAlex
W2030350989
Cited by
122
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
health beliefs, self-efficacy, physician-patient relationship, cognitive restructuring, glycemic control, diabetes self-management
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Self Care, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review