Cited by 14Biblical Studies and InterpretationReligion, Theology, History, Judaism, ChristianityKarl Barth and Christian Theology

Paul's Contestation of Israel's (Ethnic) Memory of Abraham in Galatians 3

Esler, P. F.·2006·Biblical Theology Bulletin: Journal of Bible and Culture

Abstract

This essay proposes an explanation for the prominent role of Abraham in Galatians 3. While the view of existing scholarship that Paul is responding to a case being made by his opponents is accepted, there are difficulties with the current proposals. Paul's opponents are not likely to have invoked Abraham as part of a theological case, or because of his connection with circumcision or with blessings. An explanation is needed which focuses on the question of Abrahamic descent in the totality of its dimensions. By adopting aspects of theories of ethnicity, social identity and, above all, collective memory, it is argued, firstly, that Abraham was central to the ethnic identity and collective memory of first century Judeans and that Paul's opponents were offering his converts the exalted status of Abrahamic descent as a reward for becoming Judeans through circumcision. Secondly, Paul's argument in Galatians 3 represents a fundamental contestation of this memory. He formulates a counter-memory for installation in the hearts and minds of his audience. He does this by arguing that the ‘seed’ or descendants of Abraham to whom God had made promises were not Judeans but rather Christ and those who were one with him in baptism. Thus he wrenches the prize that was Abraham from the Judeans and lodges it among his mixed congregations of non-Judean and Judean Christ-followers. The audacity of Paul's enterprise is evident in his leaving no room for Judeans who had not found faith in Christ to be Abraham's descendants, a radical position from which he would later withdraw in Romans 4.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/01461079060360010302

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The identity of the Christ-movement, especially where it consisted of groups of Judeans and non-Judeans sharing mixed table-fellowship of the Lord's Supper, was not ethnic in the Barthian sense, even if it sometimes used ethnic language symbolically.

    “On the one hand, the identity of the Christ-movement, especially (although not exclusively) where it consisted of groups of Judeans and non-Judeans sharing the mixed table-fellowship of the Lord's Supper, was not ethnic in this sense, even if it did, at times, use ethnic language in a symbolical or fictive way to de-scribe its own distinctive sense of group identity, as with Paul's enlistment of”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Esler, P. F.
Corresponding author
Esler, P. F.
Venue
Biblical Theology Bulletin: Journal of Bible and Culture
Published
2006-02-01
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
23-34
ISSN
  • 0146-1079 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7596
OpenAlex
W2015894594
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
30.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biblical Theology Bulletin Journal of Bible and Culture (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Karl Barth and Christian Theology
Keywords
Abraham, Paul, collective memory, ethnic identity, circumcision, Judeans, social identity, counter-memory, baptism, Romans 4, Pauline theology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review