Paul's Contestation of Israel's (Ethnic) Memory of Abraham in Galatians 3
Abstract
This essay proposes an explanation for the prominent role of Abraham in Galatians 3. While the view of existing scholarship that Paul is responding to a case being made by his opponents is accepted, there are difficulties with the current proposals. Paul's opponents are not likely to have invoked Abraham as part of a theological case, or because of his connection with circumcision or with blessings. An explanation is needed which focuses on the question of Abrahamic descent in the totality of its dimensions. By adopting aspects of theories of ethnicity, social identity and, above all, collective memory, it is argued, firstly, that Abraham was central to the ethnic identity and collective memory of first century Judeans and that Paul's opponents were offering his converts the exalted status of Abrahamic descent as a reward for becoming Judeans through circumcision. Secondly, Paul's argument in Galatians 3 represents a fundamental contestation of this memory. He formulates a counter-memory for installation in the hearts and minds of his audience. He does this by arguing that the ‘seed’ or descendants of Abraham to whom God had made promises were not Judeans but rather Christ and those who were one with him in baptism. Thus he wrenches the prize that was Abraham from the Judeans and lodges it among his mixed congregations of non-Judean and Judean Christ-followers. The audacity of Paul's enterprise is evident in his leaving no room for Judeans who had not found faith in Christ to be Abraham's descendants, a radical position from which he would later withdraw in Romans 4.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The identity of the Christ-movement, especially where it consisted of groups of Judeans and non-Judeans sharing mixed table-fellowship of the Lord's Supper, was not ethnic in the Barthian sense, even if it sometimes used ethnic language symbolically.
“On the one hand, the identity of the Christ-movement, especially (although not exclusively) where it consisted of groups of Judeans and non-Judeans sharing the mixed table-fellowship of the Lord's Supper, was not ethnic in this sense, even if it did, at times, use ethnic language in a symbolical or fictive way to de-scribe its own distinctive sense of group identity, as with Paul's enlistment of”
From Intergroup Conflict and Matthew 23: Towards Responsible Historical Interpretation of a Challenging Text (2015) · cites this paper as Esler 2006
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Esler, P. F. (2015) · Biblical Theology Bulletin: Journal of Bible and Culture · doi:10.1177/0146107914564824 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Esler, P. F.
- Corresponding author
- Esler, P. F.
- ORCID
- Esler, P. F.
- Venue
- Biblical Theology Bulletin: Journal of Bible and Culture
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-02-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-34
- ISSN
- 0146-1079 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7596
- OpenAlex
- W2015894594
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 30.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biblical Theology Bulletin Journal of Bible and Culture (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Karl Barth and Christian Theology
- Keywords
- Abraham, Paul, collective memory, ethnic identity, circumcision, Judeans, social identity, counter-memory, baptism, Romans 4, Pauline theology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review