Cited by 148Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningLeadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies

The self-protective altruist: Terror management and the ambivalent nature of prosocial behavior

Hirschberger, Gilad, Ein-Dor, Tsachi, Almakias, Shaul·2008·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

Three studies examined the hypothesis that mortality salience (MS) will increase prosocial behaviors when the prosocial cause promotes terror management processes. However, when the prosocial cause interferes with these processes, MS will reduce prosocial behavior. In Study 1, following a MS procedure, participants indicated their willingness to donate money to charity or to donate to an organ donation organization. In Study 2, a research assistant randomly distributed fliers with reminders of death or back pain, and another research assistant solicited participants' assistance from either a charitable fund booth or an organ donation booth. Study 3 examined the impact of MS on helping a wheelchair-bound confederate or a walking confederate. The results indicated that MS increased charitable donations and increased help to a walking confederate. However, MS significantly decreased organ donation card signings and decreased help to a wheelchair-bound confederate. The discussion examines the tension between personal fear and worldview validation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167207313933

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mortality salience increases donations to charities, particularly when the charity aims to help the individuals' own community.

    “Indeed, MS increases donations to charities, particularly when the charity aims to help the individuals' own community [23,56].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 69 · Cited by 148

Authors
Hirschberger, G., Ein-Dor, T., & Almakias, S.
Affiliations
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
  • Bar-Ilan University
Corresponding author
Hirschberger, Gilad
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2008-03-05
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
666-678
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2106735195
Cited by
148
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
Keywords
terror management theory, mortality salience, prosocial behavior, altruism, worldview defense, charitable giving, organ donation, helping behavior, ambivalence, fear of death
MeSH terms
Adult, Altruism, Attitude to Death, Back Pain, Charities, Defense Mechanisms, Empathy, Fear, Female, Helping Behavior, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Tissue and Organ Procurement, Personality Inventory, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review