The self-protective altruist: Terror management and the ambivalent nature of prosocial behavior
Abstract
Three studies examined the hypothesis that mortality salience (MS) will increase prosocial behaviors when the prosocial cause promotes terror management processes. However, when the prosocial cause interferes with these processes, MS will reduce prosocial behavior. In Study 1, following a MS procedure, participants indicated their willingness to donate money to charity or to donate to an organ donation organization. In Study 2, a research assistant randomly distributed fliers with reminders of death or back pain, and another research assistant solicited participants' assistance from either a charitable fund booth or an organ donation booth. Study 3 examined the impact of MS on helping a wheelchair-bound confederate or a walking confederate. The results indicated that MS increased charitable donations and increased help to a walking confederate. However, MS significantly decreased organ donation card signings and decreased help to a wheelchair-bound confederate. The discussion examines the tension between personal fear and worldview validation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mortality salience increases donations to charities, particularly when the charity aims to help the individuals' own community.
“Indeed, MS increases donations to charities, particularly when the charity aims to help the individuals' own community [23,56].”
From An Appreciative View of the Brighter Side of Terror Management Processes (2015) · cites this paper as [56]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 69 · Cited by 148
- Authors
- Hirschberger, G., Ein-Dor, T., & Almakias, S.
- Affiliations
- Bar-Ilan University (IL)
- Bar-Ilan University
- Corresponding author
- Hirschberger, Gilad
- ORCID
- Hirschberger, Gilad
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-03-05
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 666-678
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W2106735195
- Cited by
- 148
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 5.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
- Keywords
- terror management theory, mortality salience, prosocial behavior, altruism, worldview defense, charitable giving, organ donation, helping behavior, ambivalence, fear of death
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Altruism, Attitude to Death, Back Pain, Charities, Defense Mechanisms, Empathy, Fear, Female, Helping Behavior, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Tissue and Organ Procurement, Personality Inventory, Social Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review