Cited by 182Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionEmotions and Moral BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Misery Has More Company Than People Think: Underestimating the Prevalence of Others’ Negative Emotions

Open access
Jordan, Alexander H., Monin, Benoît, Dweck, Carol S., Lovett, Benjamin J., John, Oliver P., Gross, James J.·2011·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

Four studies document underestimations of the prevalence of others’ negative emotions and suggest causes and correlates of these erroneous perceptions. In Study 1a, participants reported that their negative emotions were more private or hidden than were their positive emotions; in Study 1b, participants underestimated the peer prevalence of common negative, but not positive, experiences described in Study 1a. In Study 2, people underestimated negative emotions and overestimated positive emotions even for well-known peers, and this effect was partially mediated by the degree to which those peers reported suppression of negative (vs. positive) emotions. Study 3 showed that lower estimations of the prevalence of negative emotional experiences predicted greater loneliness and rumination and lower life satisfaction and that higher estimations for positive emotional experiences predicted lower life satisfaction. Taken together, these studies suggest that people may think they are more alone in their emotional difficulties than they really are.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167210390822

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals who experience higher levels of FoMO want to feel as if they belong in their social settings, express higher levels of social envy, and experience feelings that they are being socially excluded.

    “Individuals who experience higher levels of FoMO want to feel as if they belong in their social settings, express higher levels of social envy, and experience feelings that they are being socially excluded [54,61].”

    From Fear of missing out, social media influencers, and the social, psychological and financial wellbeing of young consumers (2025) · cites this paper as [61]

    The General Discussion section, “Distorted Perceptions of Peers’ Social Lives” (page unavailable), links underestimating peers’ negative emotions with greater loneliness. Our copy does not address FoMO or establish that people with higher FoMO have a stronger desire to belong, greater social envy, or feelings of social exclusion; searches for those terms found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 54 · Cited by 182

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Allport FH 1924 Social psychology Cambridge, MA Riverside Press
  2. Bower GH 1991 Mood congruity of social judgments Forgas JP Emotion and social judgments 31 53 Elmsford, NY Pergamon Press
  3. Chambers JR Suls J 2007 The role of egocentrism and focalism in the emotion intensity bias Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43 618 625
  4. Coates D Peterson BA 1982 Depression and deviance Weary G Mirels HL Integrations of clinical and social psychology 154 170 New York, NY Oxford University Press
  5. Forgas JP Bower GH Krantz S 1984 The influence of mood on perceptions of social interactions Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 20 497 513
  6. Jones EE Nisbett RE 1971 The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior Morristown, NJ General Learning Press
  7. Larson R Csikszentmihalyi M Graef R 1982 Time alone in daily experience: Loneliness or renewal? Peplau LA Perlman D Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy 40 53 New York, NY John Wiley and Sons
  8. McFarland C Miller DT 1990 Judgments of self-other similarity: Just like other people, only more so Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 16 475 484
  9. McPherson M Brashears ME Smith-Lovin L 2006 Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades American Sociological Review 71 353 375
  10. Miller DT McFarland C 1987 Pluralistic ignorance: When similarity is interpreted as dissimilarity Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53 298 305
  11. Olson BD Evans DL 1999 The role of the Big Five personality dimensions in the direction and affective consequences of everyday social comparisons Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25 1498 1508
  12. Pyszczynski T Greenberg J 1987 Toward an integration of cognitive and motivational perspectives on social inference: A biased hypothesis-testing model Berkowitz L Advances in experimental social psychology 20 297 340 New York, NY Academic Press
  13. Ross L 1977 The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process Berkowitz L Advances in experimental social psychology 10 173 220 New York, NY Academic Press
  14. Ross L Greene D House P 1977 The false consensus effect: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13 279 301
  15. Wheeler L Miyake K 1992 Social comparison in everyday life Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62 760 773

Authors
Jordan, A. H., Monin, B., Dweck, C. S., Lovett, B. J., John, O. P., & Gross, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Syracuse University (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Jordan, Alexander H.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2010-12-22
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
120-135
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2043364709
Cited by
182
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
FWCI
11.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH058147)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
emotional suppression, positive emotions, loneliness, rumination, life satisfaction, peer relationships
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Judgment, Peer Group, Personal Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Repression, Psychology, Social Values, Prevalence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review