Cited by 255Social and Intergroup PsychologyCultural Differences and ValuesIntimate Partner and Family Violence

Field Experiments Examining the Culture of Honor: The Role of Institutions in Perpetuating Norms about Violence

Open access
Cohen, Dov, Nisbett, Richard E.·1997·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

Two field experiments illustrate how institutions of the U.S. South and West can help perpetuate violence related to a culture of honor. In Study 1, employers across the United States were sent letters from job applicants who had allegedly killed someone in an honor-related conflict. Southern and western companies were more likely than their northern counterparts to respond in an understanding and cooperative way. In Study 2, newspapers were sent facts for a story concerning a stabbing in response to a family insult. Southern and western papers created stories that were more sympathetic toward the perpetrator and presented his actions as more justified than northern papers did. Control conditions in both studies showed that the greater sympathy of southern and western institutions involves honor-related violence, not all violence or crime in general. Findings highlight the importance of examining the role of institutional behavior in perpetuating culture.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/01461672972311006

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Later studies using correspondence tests report that, all else equal, contact with the criminal justice system leads to worse employment opportunities.

    “Each of these studies reports the similar finding that, all else equal, contact with the criminal justice system leads to worse employment opportunities.”

    From The Mark of a Criminal Record (2003) · cites this paper as Cohen and Nisbett 1997

    Study 1 (p. 3) is a correspondence-style employment test, and the Discussion (p. 10) recounts an employer saying he could not hire the applicant because of legal issues. But both applicant letters described a criminal conviction, so the study did not compare applicants with and without criminal-justice contact or establish the claimed general effect on employment opportunities. The Results (p. 5) also say the job-availability contrast was not significant. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 255

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Anderson, E. (1994). The code of the streets. Atlantic Monthly, 5, 81-94. Anderson, I. E. (Ed.). (1994). Editor and publisher international yearbook. New York: Editor and Publisher.
  2. Baron, L., & Straus, M. A. (1988). Cultural and economic sources of homicide in the United States. Sociological Quarterly, 29, 371-392.
  3. Baron, L., & Straus, M. A. (1989). Four theories of rape in American society: A state-level analysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  4. Binder, A. (1993). Constructing racial rhetoric: Media depictions of harm in heavy metal and rap music. American Sociological Review, 58, 753-767.
  5. Cohen, D. (1996). Law, social policy, and violence: The impact of regional cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 961-978.
  6. Cohen, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1994). Self-protection and the culture of honor: Explaining southern violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 551-567.
  7. Cohen, D., Nisbett, R. E., Bowdle, B. F., & Schwarz, N. (1996). Insult, aggression, and the southern culture of honor: An "experimental ethnography." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 945-960.
  8. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
  9. Ellison, C. G. (1991). An eye for an eye? A note on the southern subculture of violence thesis. Social Forces, 69, 1223-1239.
  10. Famighetti, R. (Ed.). (1993). The world almanac and book of facts. Mahwah, NJ: Funk & Wagnalls.
  11. Fiske, A. P., Markus, H., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (in press). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  12. Gastil, R. D. (1971). Homicide and a regional culture of violence. American Sociological Review, 36, 412–427.
  13. Gilmore, D. D. (1990). Manhood in the making: Cultural concepts of masculinity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  14. Gates, H. L. Jr. (1995, October 23). Thirteen ways of looking at a Black man. The New Yorker, pp. 56–65.
  15. Hackney, S. (1969). Southern violence. In H. D. Graham & T. R. Gurr (Eds.), The history of violence in America (pp. 505-527). New York: Bantam Books.
  16. Kuran, T. (1995). Private truths, public lies: The social consequences of preference falsification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  17. Land, K. C., McCall, P. L., & Cohen, L. E. (1990). Structural covariates of homicide rates: Are there any invariances across time and social space. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 922-963.
  18. Lee, F., Hallahan, M., & Herzog, T. (1996). Explaining real-life events: How culture and domain shape attributions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 732-741.
  19. Lee, R. S. (1995a). Machismo values and violence in America: An empirical study. In L. L. Adler & F. L. Denmark (Eds.), Violence and the prevention of violence (pp. 11-31). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  20. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1991). Culture and socialization in work groups. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 257-279). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  21. Martin,J. (1992). Cultures in organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.
  22. Meyers, M. (1994). News of battering. Journal of Communication, 44, 47-63.
  23. Miller, D. T., & Prentice, D. A. (1994). Collective errors and errors about the collective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 541-550.
  24. Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949-971.
  25. Nisbett, R. E., Polly, G., & Lang, S. (1995). Homicide and regional U.S. culture. In R. B. Ruback & N. A. Weiner (Eds.), Interpersonal violent behaviors (pp. 135-151). New York: Springer.
  26. Pitt-Rivers, J. (1968). Honor. In D. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (pp. 503-511). New York: Macmillan.
  27. Pitt-Rivers, J. (1965). Honour and social status. In J. G. Peristiany (Ed.), Honour and shame: The values of Mediterranean society (pp. 21-77). London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
  28. Pratt, M. G. (1994). The happiest, most dissatisfied people on earth: Ambivalence and commitment among Amway distributors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
  29. Reed, J. S. (1981). Below the Smith and Wesson line: Reflections on southern violence. In M. Black &J. S. Reed (Eds.), Perspectives on the American South: An annual review of society, politics, and culture (pp. 922). New York: Cordon & Breach Science.
  30. Rosenthal, R, & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  31. Rice, T. W., & Goldman, C. R. (1994). Another look at the subculture of violence thesis: Who murders whom and under what circumstances. Sociological Spectrum, 14, 371-384.
  32. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  33. Salancik, G. R. (1979). Field stimulations for organizational behavior research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 638-649.
  34. Sperber, D. (1990). The epidemiology of beliefs. In C. Fraser & G. Gaskell (Eds.), The social psychological study of widespread beliefs (pp. 25–44). Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
  35. Sunstein, C. R. (1995, December 25). True lies. The New Republic, pp. 37-41.
  36. Wyatt-Brown, B. (1982). Southern honor: Ethics and behavior in the Old South. New York: Oxford University Press.

Authors
Cohen, D., & Nisbett, R. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Cohen, Dov
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
1997-11
Volume
23
Issue
11
Pages
1188-1199
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2060685252
Cited by
255
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
9.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Keywords
honor culture, honour-related violence, regional variation, Southern United States, American West, hiring decisions, media framing, intergroup conflict

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review