Cited by 125Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologySepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients

Glutamine and Antioxidants in the Critically Ill Patient: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Large‐Scale Randomized Trial

Open access
Heyland, Daren K., Elke, Gunnar, Cook, Deborah, Berger, Mette M., Wischmeyer, Paul E., Albert, Martin, Muscedere, John, Jones, Gwynne +2 more·2015·Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

Abstract

Background: The recent large randomized controlled trial of glutamine and antioxidant supplementation suggested that high‐dose glutamine is associated with increased mortality in critically ill patients with multiorgan failure. The objectives of the present analyses were to reevaluate the effect of supplementation after controlling for baseline covariates and to identify potentially important subgroup effects. Materials and Methods : This study was a post hoc analysis of a prospective factorial 2 × 2 randomized trial conducted in 40 intensive care units in North America and Europe. In total, 1223 mechanically ventilated adult patients with multiorgan failure were randomized to receive glutamine, antioxidants, both glutamine and antioxidants, or placebo administered separate from artificial nutrition. We compared each of the 3 active treatment arms (glutamine alone, antioxidants alone, and glutamine + antioxidants) with placebo on 28‐day mortality. Post hoc, treatment effects were examined within subgroups defined by baseline patient characteristics. Logistic regression was used to estimate treatment effects within subgroups after adjustment for baseline covariates and to identify treatment‐by‐subgroup interactions (effect modification). Results : The 28‐day mortality rates in the placebo, glutamine, antioxidant, and combination arms were 25%, 32%, 29%, and 33%, respectively. After adjusting for prespecified baseline covariates, the adjusted odds ratio of 28‐day mortality vs placebo was 1.5 (95% confidence interval, 1.0–2.1, P = .05), 1.2 (0.8–1.8, P = .40), and 1.4 (0.9–2.0, P = .09) for glutamine, antioxidant, and glutamine plus antioxidant arms, respectively. In the post hoc subgroup analysis, both glutamine and antioxidants appeared most harmful in patients with baseline renal dysfunction. No subgroups suggested reduced mortality with supplements. Conclusions: After adjustment for baseline covariates, early provision of high‐dose glutamine administered separately from artificial nutrition was not beneficial and may be associated with increased mortality in critically ill patients with multiorgan failure. For both glutamine and antioxidants, the greatest potential for harm was observed in patients with multiorgan failure that included renal dysfunction upon study enrollment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0148607114529994

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The REDOXS study randomization was associated with higher severity with more organ failures in the GLN groups upon enrollment, largely explaining the higher mortality.

    “The REDOXS study [85], designed as a 2 x 2 factorial trial, generated concerns for several reasons, including the fact that the randomization was associated with higher severity with more organ failures in the GLN groups upon enrollment, largely explaining the higher mortality.”

    From ESPEN practical and partially revised guideline: Clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit (2023) · cites this paper as [85]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) acknowledges a random imbalance in organ failures across groups but says the increased mortality associated with glutamine persisted after adjustment and was independent of the number of organ failures. It explicitly says that the imbalance did not affect the authors’ main inference, contrary to the claim that it largely explains the higher mortality. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Rodas et al. showed a U-shaped association between plasma GLN levels and outcome.

    “Rodas et al. (208) showed a U-shaped association between plasma GLN levels and outcome.”

    From ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. (2019) · cites this paper as [208]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) cites Rodas et al. as reference 21 and reports a possible U-shaped relationship between plasma glutamine levels and 6-month mortality in critically ill patients. The claim captures that relationship but says Rodas et al. “showed” it without the source’s uncertainty qualifier (“may be”). (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A post hoc analysis of REDOXS confirmed the harmful effect of both glutamine and antioxidants, particularly in patients with renal dysfunction.

    “A post hoc analysis by the same group confirmed the harmful effect of both glutamine and antioxidants, particularly in patients with renal dysfunction [49].”

    From Nutrition in Sepsis: A Bench-to-Bedside Review. (2020) · cites this paper as [49]

  • Plasma GLN levels have repeatedly been shown to be low during critical illness, and low values to be associated with poor outcome.

    “Plasma GLN levels have repeatedly been shown to be low during critical illness, and low values to be associated with poor outcome (206,207,208).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. [1]Motoyama T, Okamoto K, Kukita I, Hamaguchi M, Kinoshita Y, Ogawa H. Possible role of increased oxidant stress in multiple organ failure after systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2003; 31: 1048– 1052. 12682471
  2. [2]Alonso de Vega JM, Díaz J, Serrano E, Carbonell LF. Oxidative stress in critically ill patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2002; 30: 1782– 1786. 12163793
  3. [3]Goode HF, Cowley HC, Walker BE, Howdle PD, Webster NR. Decreased antioxidant status and increased lipid peroxidation in patients with septic shock and secondary organ dysfunction. Crit Care Med. 1995; 23: 646– 651. 7712754
  4. [4]Brealey D, Brand M, Hargreaves I, Association between mitochondrial dysfunction and severity and outcome of septic shock. Lancet. 2002; 360: 219– 223. 12133657
  5. [5]Goodyear-Bruch C, Pierce JD. Oxidative stress in critically ill patients. Am J Crit Care. 2002; 11: 543– 561. 12425405
  6. [6]Planas M, Schwartz S, Arbos MA, Farriol M. Plasma glutamine levels in septic patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1993; 17: 299– 300. 8505843
  7. [7]Borrelli E, Roux-Lombard P, Grau GE, Plasma concentration of cytokines, their soluble receptors, and antioxidant vitamins can predict the development of multiple organ failure in patients at risk. Crit Care Med. 1996; 24: 392– 397. 8625625
  8. [8]Oehler R, Pusch E, Dungel P, Glutamine depletion impairs cellular stress response in human leucocytes. Br J Nutr. 2002; 87: S17– S21. 11895151
  9. [9]Roth E, Funovics J, Muhlbacher F, Schemper M, Mauritz W, Sporn P. Metabolic disorders in severe abdominal sepsis: glutamine deficiency in skeletal muscle. Clin Nutr. 1982; 1: 25– 41. 16829366
  10. [10]Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Bosman RJ, Treskes M, van der Spoel JHI, Zandstra DF. Plasma glutamine depletion and patient outcome in acute ICU admissions. Intensive Care Med. 2001; 27: 84– 90. 11280678
  11. [11]Novak F, Heyland DK, Avenell A, Novak F, Drover J, Su X. Glutamine supplementation in serious illness: a systematic review of the evidence. Crit Care Med. 2002; 30: 2022– 2029. 12352035
  12. [12]Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Drover JW, Gramlich L, Dodek P, for the Guidelines Committee. Canadian clinical practice guidelines for nutrition support in the adult critically ill patient. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003; 27: 355– 373. See www.criticalnutrition.com/clinicalpracticeguidelines for the most current version of the glutamine meta-analysis Accessed August 1, 2013. 12971736
  13. [13]Heyland DK, Muscedere J, Wischmeyer P,, for the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. A randomized trial of glutamine and antioxidants in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368(16): 1489– 1497. 23594003
  14. [14]Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Day A,, for the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. REducing Deaths due to OXidative Stress: The REDOXS© Study: rationale and study design for a randomized trial of glutamine and antioxidant supplementation in critically ill patients. Proc Nutr Soc. 2006; 65(3): 250– 263. 16923310
  15. [15]Hamwi GJ. Therapy: changing dietary concepts In: Danowski TS, ed. Diabetes Mellitus: Diagnosis and Treatment. Vol 1 New York, NY: American Diabetes Association; 1964: 73– 78.
  16. [16]Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Drover JW, Gramlich L, Dodek P, for the Guidelines Committee. Canadian clinical practice guidelines for nutrition support in the adult critically ill patient. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003; 27: 355– 373. 12971736
  17. [17]Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. New York, NY: John Wiley; 1980.
  18. [18]Johnson CC, Fordyce FM, Rayman MP. Symposium on ‘Geographical and geological influences on nutrition’: factors controlling the distribution of selenium in the environment and their impact on health and nutrition. Proc Nutr Soc. 2010; 69: 119– 132. 19968907
  19. [19]Sun X, Briel M, Walter SD, Guyatt GH. Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses. BMJ. 2010; 340: c117. 20354011
  20. [20]Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Day A, Drover J, Cote H, Wischmeyer P. Optimizing the dose of glutamine dipeptides and antioxidants in critically ill patients: a phase I dose finding study. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2007; 31(2): 109– 118. 17308251
  21. [21]Rodas PC, Rooyackers O, Hebert C, Norberg A, Wernerman J. Glutamine and glutathione at ICU admission in relation to outcome. Clin Sci. 2012; 122: 591– 597. 22248298 PMC3294430
  22. [22]Brunet S, Leblanc M, Geadah D, Parent D, Courteau S, Cardinal J. Diffusive and convective solute clearances during continuous renal replacement therapy at various dialysate and ultrafiltration flow rates. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999; 34: 486– 492. 10469859
  23. [23]Angstwurm MW, Schottdorf J, Schopohl J, Gaertner R. Selenium replacement in patients with severe systemic inflammatory response syndrome improves clinical outcome. Crit Care Med. 1999; 27: 1807– 1813. 10507602
  24. [24]Angstwurm MW, Engelmann L, Zimmermann T, Selenium in Intensive Care (SIC): results of a prospective randomized, placebo-controlled, multiple-center study in patients with severe systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2007; 35(1): 118– 126. 17095947
  25. [25]Mishra V, Baines M, Perry SE, Effect of selenium supplementation on biochemical markers and outcome in critically ill patients. Clin Nutr. 2007; 26(1): 41– 50. 17174015
  26. [26]Mashour S, Turner JF Jr, Merrell R. Acute renal failure, oxalosis, and vitamin C supplementation: a case report and review of the literature. Chest. 2000; 118: 561– 563. 10936161
  27. [27]Bollhalder L, Pfeil AM, Tomonaga Y, Schwenkglenks M. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of parenteral glutamine supplementation. Clin Nutr. 2013; 32: 213– 223. 23196117

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heyland, D. K., Elke, G., Cook, D., Berger, M. M., Wischmeyer, P. E., Albert, M., Muscedere, J., Jones, G., Day, A. G., & on behalf of the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group
Affiliations
  • Kingston General Hospital (CA)
  • University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE)
  • St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton (CA)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (CA)
  • Ottawa Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Heyland, Daren K.
Venue
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-05-05
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
401-409
ISSN
  • 0148-6071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-2444
OpenAlex
W2011280034
Cited by
125
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
16.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Keywords
glutamine supplementation, antioxidant supplementation, critically ill patients, multiple organ failure, 28-day mortality, renal dysfunction, effect modification, subgroup analysis, intensive care, mechanical ventilation, dietary supplementation
MeSH terms
Aged, Antioxidants, Glutamine, Humans, Kidney, Middle Aged, Multiple Organ Failure, Prospective Studies, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Critical Illness, Hospital Mortality, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review