Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Use of Residual Volume as a Marker for Enteral Feeding Intolerance: Prospective Blinded Comparison With Physical Examination and Radiographic Findings

Mcclave, Stephen A., Snider, Harvy L., Lowen, Cynthia C., Mclaughlin, Arthur J., Greene, Lisa M., Mccombs, Ricky J., Rodgers, Linda, Wright, Richard A., Roy, Thomas M., Schumer, Mary P., Pfeifer, Michael A.·1992·Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

Abstract

High gastric residual volumes (RVs) are a frequent cause for cessation of total enteral nutrition (TEN). This study was designed to determine the RV that indicates intolerance or inadequate gastric emptying and to compare the RV findings in a blinded fashion with those findings obtained on physical examination and radiography. Twenty healthy normal volunteers (HNV), 8 stable patients with gastrostomy tubes (GTP), and 10 critically ill patients (CIP) were evaluated prospectively for 8 hours while receiving TEN. No subjects were clearly intolerant (ie, vomiting, aspiration). Of the total RVs recorded, 13.1% were ≥150 mL in the CIP group, whereas only 2.4% of the RVs were ≥150 mL in the HNV group. None of the RVs in the GTP group were ≥150 mL. Objective scores on physical examination failed to correlate with RV (p =.397), as did objective scores on radiography (p =.742). However, objective scores on physical examination were significantly related to scores on radiography (p =.016). Abnormal physical examination findings were found in 4 out of 11 patients (GTP + CIP) with RVs <100 mL and in 6 out of 7 with RVs ≥100 mL. Abnormal radiographic results were found in 6 out of 11 patients with RVs < 100 mL, in 7 out of 7 patients with RVs ≥100 mL, and in 4 out of 20 HNVs. There was no difference in RVs obtained from the supine or right lateral decubitus positions. Patients with gastrostomy tubes had lower RVs than did those with nasogastric tubes. Patients receiving higher infusion rates had higher RVs. Low RVs did not seem to guarantee tolerance and adequate gut motility because abnormalities still appeared on physical examination and radiography. A single high RV should not cause automatic cessation of TEN because it did occur in some cases in a setting with normal radiographic and physical examination results, where subsequent RVs were shown to decrease. An RV ≥200 mL obtained from a nasogastric tube (or ≥100 mL obtained from a gastrostomy tube) should raise concern about intolerance, but feedings may continue as physical examination, radiographs, and RV are monitored closely. (Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 16:99—105, 1992)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/014860719201600299

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Mcclave, S. A., Snider, H. L., Lowen, C. C., Mclaughlin, A. J., Greene, L. M., Mccombs, R. J., Rodgers, L., Wright, R. A., Roy, T. M., Schumer, M. P., & Pfeifer, M. A.
Venue
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-03
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
99-105
ISSN
  • 0148-6071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-2444
OpenAlex
W2006254464
Cited by
198
References
0
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of Residual Volume as a Marker for Enteral Feeding Intolerance: Prospective Blinded Comparison With Physical Examination and Radiographic Findings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/014860719201600299
The paper
Mcclave, S. A., Snider, H. L., Lowen, C. C., Mclaughlin, A. J., Greene, L. M., Mccombs, R. J., Rodgers, L., Wright, R. A., Roy, T. M., Schumer, M. P., & Pfeifer, M. A. (1992). Use of Residual Volume as a Marker for Enteral Feeding Intolerance: Prospective Blinded Comparison With Physical Examination and Radiographic Findings. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1177/014860719201600299

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.