Cited by 44Gastrointestinal motility and disordersClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyEnhanced Recovery After Surgery

Osmolarity Does Not Affect the Gastric Emptying Rate of Oral Rehydration Solutions

Brouns, Fred, Senden, Joan, Beckers, J., Saris, Wim H.M.·1995·Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

Abstract

Background The objective of this study was to determine the effect of either carbohydrate content or osmolarity on gastric emptying rate in normal healthy subjects. Methods In total 12 test drinks were ingested as a single 8 mL/kg per body weight bolus on an empty stomach. Six of these drinks had a different carbohydrate content, increasing stepwise from 45 to 90 g/L, but all with the same osmolarity (330 mOsm/kg). The other six drinks all contained 60 g carbohydrate/L but differed stepwise in osmolarity because of the use of maltodextrins with a difference in chain length (243 to 374 mOsm/kg). Results The results show a significant negative relation between carbohydrate content and gastric emptying in the six drinks with a uniform osmolarity but progressively increasing carbohydrate content. The six drinks, which had the same carbohydrate-energy content but different osmolarities, emptied all at the same rate from the stomach. The delivery of carbohydrate-energy per minute from the stomach to the small intestine was the same for all drinks. Conclusions From these data we conclude that the rate of gastric emptying of carbohydrate-containing solutions is triggered by the carbohydrate-energy drink content or by the delivery rate of carbohydrate-energy to the gut. Osmolarity in the range studied here had no effect.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0148607195019005403

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The osmolarity of a test drink appears to play no important role, but its carbohydrate content does.

    “The osmolarity of a test drink seems to play no important role but the CHO content does.”

    From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Brouns et al. 1995

  • Brouns et al. (1995) observed a constant delivery of about 1.2 g carbohydrate/min for various solutions containing 45-90 g carbohydrate/l and osmolarity 243-374 mOsm/kg.

    “For example Brouns et al. (1995) observed a constant delivery of about 1•2 g CHO/min for various solutions containing a range of 45 -90 g CHO/l and an osmolarity of 243-374 mOsm/kg.”

    From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Brouns et al. (1995)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brouns, F., Senden, J., Beckers, J., & Saris, W. H. M.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Venue
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-09
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
403-406
ISSN
  • 0148-6071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-2444
OpenAlex
W1996341960
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Keywords
gastric emptying, osmolarity, oral rehydration solution, carbohydrate content, oral rehydration therapy
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Body Weight, Dietary Carbohydrates, Energy Metabolism, Gastric Emptying, Humans, Male, Osmolar Concentration, Time Factors, Rehydration Solutions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review