The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collaborative JPEN‐Clinical Nutrition Scientific Publications Role of intestinal bacteria in nutrient metabolism
Abstract
The human large intestine contains a microbiota, the components of which are generically complex and metabolically diverse. Its primary function is to salvage energy from carbohydrate not digested in the upper gut. This is achieved through fermentation and absorption of the major products, short chain fatty acids (SCFA), which represent 40–50% of the available energy of the carbohydrate. The principal SCFA, acetate, propionate and butyrate, are metabolized by the colonic epithelium (butyrate), liver (propionate) and muscle (acetate). Intestinal bacteria also have a role in the synthesis of vitamins B and K and the metabolism of bile acids, other sterols and xenobiotics. The colonic microflora are also responsive to diet. In the presence of fermentable carbohydrate substrates such as non‐starch polysaccharides, resistant starch and oligosaccharides, bacteria grow and actively synthesize protein. The amount of protein synthesis and turnover within the large intestine is difficult to determine, but around 15 g biomass is excreted in faeces each day containing 1 g bacterial‐N. Whether bacterially synthesized amino acids are ever absorbed from the colon remains unclear. Finally, individual colonic micro‐organisms such as sulphate‐reducing bacteria, bifidobacteria and clostridia, respond selectively to specific dietary components in a way that may be important to health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE MICROBIAL CONTRIBUTION TO HUMAN FAECAL MASS
Stephen, A. M., & Cummings, J. H. (1980) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00222615-13-1-45 · Cited by 545
Self-citationFecal weight, colon cancer risk, and dietary intake of nonstarch polysaccharides (dietary fiber)
Cummings, J. H., Bingham, S. A., Heaton, K. W., & Eastwood, M. A. (1992) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/0016-5085(92)91435-7 · Cited by 462
Self-citation
Cited by
Cryan, J. F., O'Riordan, K. J., Cowan, C. S. M., Sandhu, K. V., Bastiaanssen, T. F. S., Boehme, M., Codagnone, M. G., Cussotto, S., Fulling, C., Golubeva, A. V., et al. (2019) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00018.2018 · Cited by 5,286
Gut microbiota-derived metabolites as key actors in inflammatory bowel disease
Lavelle, A., & Sokol, H. (2020) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-019-0258-z · Cited by 2,015
Wolfe, A. J. (2005) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.69.1.12-50.2005 · Cited by 1,233
Alleviating Cancer Drug Toxicity by Inhibiting a Bacterial Enzyme
Wallace, B. D., Wang, H., Lane, K. T., Scott, J. E., Orans, J., Koo, J. S., Venkatesh, M., Jobin, C., Yeh, L.-A., Mani, S., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1191175 · Cited by 1,080
Postler, T. S., & Ghosh, S. (2017) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2017.05.008 · Cited by 876
Metadata
- Authors
- Cummings, J. H., & Macfarlane, G. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-11
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 357-365
- ISSN
- 0148-6071 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-2444
- OpenAlex
- W1607924216
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.