CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3,451Innovation and Knowledge ManagementIntellectual Capital and Performance AnalysisHuman Resource and Talent Management

The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991

Barney, Jay, Wright, Mike, Ketchen, David J.·2001·Journal of Management
DOI 10.1177/014920630102700601
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

At present, the resource-based view of the firm is perhaps the most influential framework for understanding strategic management. In this editor’s introduction, we briefly describe the contributions to knowledge provided by the commentaries and articles contained in this issue. In addition, we outline some additional areas of research wherein the resource-based view can be gainfully deployed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/014920630102700601

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The RBV is based on the argument that dynamic and unique capabilities may enable a firm to generate competitive advantage in the face of external changes or constraints in the business environment.

    “It is based on the argument that dynamic and unique capabilities may enable a firm to generate competitive advantage in the face of external changes or constraints in the business environment (Barney et al 2001).”

    From Conceptualising the adoption of sustainable procurement: an institutional theory perspective (2014) · cites this paper as Barney et al 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Florida State University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Management
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2001-12
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
625-641
ISSN
  • 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1211
DOI
10.1177/014920630102700601
OpenAlex
W2093322402
Cited by
3,451
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 141 · 2025: 183 · 2024: 210 · 2023: 220 · 2022: 192 · 2021: 213 · 2020: 165 · 2019: 184 · 2018: 164 · 2017: 137 · 2016: 150 · 2015: 181 · 2014: 195 · 2013: 174 · 2012: 148
FWCI
104.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Management (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
Keywords
resource-based view, strategic management, organizational capabilities, competitive advantage, research agenda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review