The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
City–County Consolidations: Promise Versus Performance
Abstract
This essay explores city–county consolidations and the extent of alignment between the advantages promised by consolidation advocates and the performance of such government structures. Peer-reviewed research specifically bearing on city–county consolidations is presented together with supporting research on the consolidation of local governments in general. The performance of such consolidations is evaluated on three dimensions: efficiency in service delivery, promotion of economic development, and increased equity in terms of urban/suburban disparities and the impact on ethnic minority representation. The authors conclude that little empirical research exists to suggest that city–county consolidations actually increase efficiency, promote economic development, or increase equity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Consolidation has typically not resulted in cost reductions”
From Regionalization and Consolidation of Municipal Taxes and Services (2018) · cites this paper as Martin and Schiff, 2011
In the citing paper
“Martin and Schiff (2011) mention that a 2007 study by the Pennsylvania Economy League (PEA) finds that the loss of minority representation has not been an overt problem for city-county consolidations due to the standards set up by the federal Voting Rights Act which ensures legislative rights for minorities.”
From Regionalization and Consolidation of Municipal Taxes and Services (2018) · cites this paper as Martin and Schiff, 2011
In the citing paper
“Since 1815 in the U.S., 166 city-county consolidations have been attempted but only 39 have been implemented (Martin and Schiff, 2011).”
From Regionalization and Consolidation of Municipal Taxes and Services (2018) · cites this paper as Martin and Schiff, 2011
Citations
Cites
City-County Government and Promises of Economic Development: A Tale of Two Cities
Carr, J. B., Bae, S.-S., & Lu, W. (2006) · State and Local Government Review · doi:10.1177/0160323x0603800301 · Cited by 30
Scale economies and police department consolidation: Evidence from Los Angeles
FINNEY, M. (1997) · Contemporary Economic Policy · doi:10.1111/j.1465-7287.1997.tb00459.x · Cited by 27 · cited 1×
“Conversely, the majority of these studies report no efficiency gains from functional consolidations (Duncombe and Yinger 1992; Finney 1997; Gyapong and Gyimah-Brempong 1988; Gyimah-Brempong 1987; Mehay 1984).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 57
- 10.2307/1927768 · DOI
- Baird Robert, 1972, Nebraska Journal of Economics and Business, 11, 171
- 10.1086/NTJ41788721 · DOI
- Benton J. Edwin, 1984, Social Science Quarterly, 65, 190
- 10.1080/01944369608975699 · DOI
- Bloomquist William, 1995, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 25, 37
- 10.1080/10511482.2002.9521458 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1992.tb00942.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/004208169202700407 · DOI
- Carl Vinson Institute of Government, 2007, An Assessment of Consolidation Feasibility for Fayetteville and Cumberland County North Carolina
- 10.1177/10780879922184031 · DOI
- Clarke Kristen, 2006, Houston Law Review, 43, 621
- 10.1177/004208169002600102 · DOI
- 10.1016/0047-2727(93)90104-2 · DOI
- 10.1086/NTJ41788834 · DOI
- 10.1177/0160323X9702900304 · DOI
- 10.1016/0962-6298(93)90003-P · DOI
- Forbes Kevin, 1989, American Economic Review, 79, 568
- 10.1177/107808749803300605 · DOI
- 10.2307/1059522 · DOI
- 10.2307/1927244 · DOI
- Johnson Linda, 2004, Case Studies of City-County Consolidation: Reshaping the Local Government Landscape, 60
- Johnson Linda, 2004, City-County Consolidation and its Alternatives, 246
- Kent Calvin, 2005, Local Government Consolidation: Lessons for West Virginia
- 10.1108/13639519710180132 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01047775 · DOI
- 10.1111/0952-1895.00089 · DOI
- Mattoon Richard H., 1995, Economic Perspectives, 19, 20
- 10.1111/j.1754-7121.2002.tb01858.x · DOI
- 10.1108/09513550410526284 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00163770 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00118767 · DOI
- Miller David, 1995, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 25, 19
- 10.1177/1078087405279466 · DOI
- 10.1177/107808749903400403 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00127344 · DOI
- Nelson Michael, 1987, American Economic Review, 77, 198
- 10.1111/0735-2166.00019 · DOI
- Oates Wallace E., 1985, American Economic Review, 75, 748
- Pennsylvania Economy League (PEA), 2007, A Comparative Analysis of City/County Consolidations
- Parks Roger, 1993, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 23, 19
- 10.1177/10780870022184741 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00096.x · DOI · Paper page
- Rosentraub Mark S. 2000. City-County consolidation and the rebuilding of image: The fiscal lessons from Indianapolis' uniGov program. State and Local Government Review 32:180–91. http://www.cviog.uga.edu/publications/slgr/issues.php. Accessed August 27, 2009. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0275074009333175 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF00051622 · DOI
- 10.1080/02697450120107907 · DOI
- Selden Sally C., 2000, Public Administration Quarterly, 24, 169
- Staley Samuel. 2005. The effects of city-county consolidation of local government services: A survey of academic experts. Wayne, IN: Indiana Policy Review Foundation. http://www.inpolicy.org. Accessed November 29, 2009.
- Staley Samuel R., Faulk Dagney, Leland Suzanne M., Schandberg Eric. 2005. The effects of city-county consolidation: A review of the recent academic literature. Wayne, IN: Indiana Policy Review Foundation. http://www.inpolicy.org. Accessed August 26, 2009.
- 10.1016/j.jue.2004.08.002 · DOI
- 10.1177/0160323X0003200307 · DOI
- 10.1086/466831 · DOI
- 10.1111/0735-2166.00063 · DOI · Paper page
- Yasuoka Masaharu, 2008, The Japanese Journal of American Studies, 19, 117
- Zax Jeffery, 1988, Fiscal federalism, 79
- Zax Jeffery, 1989, American Economic Review, 79, 560
Cited by
Regionalization and Consolidation of Municipal Taxes and Services
Hall, J. C., Matti, J., & Zhou, Y. (2018) · Review of Regional Studies · doi:10.52324/001c.8001 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, L. L., & Schiff, J. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Central Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schiff, Jeannie Hock
- ORCID
- Martin, Lawrence L.
- Venue
- State and Local Government Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-06-16
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 167-177
- ISSN
- 0160-323X (ISSN-L)
- 1943-3409
- OpenAlex
- W2314959793
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 21.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- State and Local Government Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Local Government Finance and Decentralization
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Local Governance and Planning
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Keywords
- city-county consolidation, municipal mergers, administrative efficiency, service delivery, economic development, ethnic minority representation, municipal government structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review