Cited by 5Public Policy and Administration ResearchPolicing Practices and PerceptionsLocal Government Finance and Decentralization

The Role of Capacity and Problem Severity in Adopting Voluntary Intergovernmental Partnerships: The Case of Tribes, States, and Local Governments

Conner, Thaddieus W., Witt, Stephanie L.·2016·State and Local Government Review

Abstract

Literature on intergovernmental partnerships suggests the importance of several factors including organizational resources, capacity, and problem severity in understanding the adoption of these partnerships. This research improves our understanding about the adoption of intergovernmental partnerships by examining tribal and nontribal governments that adopted voluntary agreements to improve the administration of justice. Using data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics, this research examines how socioeconomic conditions, problem severity, and law enforcement authority influence the adoption of partnership agreements between tribal and nontribal law enforcement. The results suggest that tribes that adopt partnerships have better socioeconomic conditions; nontribal actors have lower levels of authority and higher occurrences of violent crime. The presence of Indian gaming also increases the likelihood of adopting cooperative agreements. The results of this study provide an important insight into understanding intergovernmental cooperation in general and what drives cooperation between native and surrounding non-native communities in particular.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0160323x16653450

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have attempted to quantify and understand the nature, scope, and negotiation of intergovernmental agreements among tribal and state governments, but many of these do not reflect recent trends and need updating.

    “Previous studies have attempted to quantify and understand the nature, scope, and negotiation of intergovernmental agreements among tribal and state governments (Conner and Witt 2016;Pommersheim 1991), but many of these do not reflect recent trends and need updating.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conner, T. W., & Witt, S. L.
Affiliations
  • New Mexico State University (US)
  • Boise State University (US)
Corresponding author
Conner, Thaddieus W.
Venue
State and Local Government Review
Published
2016-06
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
87-99
ISSN
  • 0160-323X (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-3409
OpenAlex
W2429577934
Cited by
5
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
State and Local Government Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Local Government Finance and Decentralization
Keywords
intergovernmental partnerships, tribal government, judicial administration, problem severity, organizational capacity, law enforcement authority, Indian gaming, intergovernmental cooperation, violent crime, socioeconomic conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review