The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interspecies Parenting: How Pet Parents Construct Their Roles
Abstract
This qualitative study explores a widespread contemporary family form, the interspecies family, to understand how people who count their cats and dogs as family members describe this process of becoming and maintaining family. We focus on one aspect of interspecies families—pet parenting. We find that even though individuals say their pets are family, not all consider themselves to be parents or engaged in pet parenting. Participants with human children differed somewhat from those without human children, suggesting that family form shapes pet parenting experiences. Childless participants draw heavily from larger cultural narratives surrounding parenting to construct the parent–pet child relationship. Those with younger human children talk about the relationship primarily from a place of difference, while those with older human children construct the relationship in similar ways to childless individuals and emphasize similarities between raising children and pets. This study contributes to the literature on family change and human–animal relationships within households.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In particular, many people view their pets as children [84,85,86,87] and think of themselves as ‘pet parents’.”
From Disenfranchised Guilt-Pet Owners' Burden. (2022) · cites this paper as [87]
Citations
Cites
WEST, C., & ZIMMERMAN, D. H. (1987) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002 · Cited by 8,954
Research works printed but not linked: 59
- 10.1007/s12147-014-9115-0 · DOI
- 10.2307/352019 · DOI
- 10.4159/9780674020184 · DOI
- 10.2307/352865 · DOI
- Beck Alan, 1988, Between Pets and People: The Importance of Animal Companionship
- 10.1086/209154 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1163/156853096X00115 · DOI · Paper page
- Berger Peter L., 1966, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge
- 10.1111/soc4.12102 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2012.00494.x · DOI · Paper page
- Cain Ann, 1983, New Perspectives on Our Lives with Companion Animals, 71
- Carrigan Christopher, 1999, No Place like Home: Relationships among Lesbians and Gay Men
- Charmaz K., 2006, Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis
- 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00710.x · DOI
- DeMello Margo, 2012, Animals and Society: An Introduction to Human-animal Studies
- 10.1111/1475-682X.00006 · DOI
- Enos Sandra, 2001, Mothering from the Inside
- 10.18584/iipj.2013.4.1.8 · DOI
- 10.1080/0261436022000030632 · DOI
- 10.1163/1568530041446544 · DOI
- Hays Sharon, 1996, The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood
- 10.4135/9781848608160.n4 · DOI
- 10.1086/209374 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4135/9781412986120 · DOI
- 10.1300/J002v28n03_02 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10869-014-9361-x · DOI
- 10.1108/01443330410790740 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00163.x · DOI
- Irvine Leslie, 2013, My Dog Always Eats First: Homeless People and Their Animals
- 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.01008.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2006.00165.x · DOI
- 10.1111/soin.12163 · DOI
- Lupton Deborah, 1997, Constructing Fatherhood: Discourses and Experiences
- 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.00002.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0002764203255210 · DOI
- 10.2307/2653934 · DOI
- 10.1002/pam.20215 · DOI
- Powell Brian, 2010, Counted Out: Same-sex Relations and Americans’ Definitions of Family
- PR Newswire, 2015, PR Newswire US
- 10.1525/si.2006.29.3.373 · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199755776.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1177/0886109906292314 · DOI
- 10.1177/0021934713488786 · DOI
- Sanders Clinton R., 1999, Understanding Dogs: Living and Working with Canine Companions
- 10.1525/si.2003.26.3.405 · DOI · Paper page
- Schaffer Michael, 2009, One Nation Under Dog: America’s Love Affair with Our Dogs
- 10.1177/0038040709356566 · DOI
- Serpell James, 1986, In the Company of Animals: A Study of Human–animal Relationships
- 10.1111/j.1548-1433.2012.01443.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00719.x · DOI
- 10.2752/089279391787057206 · DOI
- Thomas Keith, 1991, Man and the Natural World: Changing Attitudes in England 1500–1800
- 10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.78 · DOI
- Turner Wendy G., 2001, The Qualitative Report, 6, 1
- 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00721.x · DOI
- 10.1300/J002v08n03_03 · DOI
- 10.1177/0891243207304973 · DOI
- 10.5172/jfs.327.13.2.224 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203167168 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Disenfranchised Guilt-Pet Owners' Burden.
Kogan, L. R., Bussolari, C., Currin-McCulloch, J., Packman, W., & Erdman, P. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12131690 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Owens, N., & Grauerholz, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- University of Central Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Grauerholz, Liz
- ORCID
- Grauerholz, Liz
- Venue
- Humanity & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-01-02
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 96-119
- ISSN
- 0160-5976 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-9708
- OpenAlex
- W2781965244
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Humanity & Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographies of human-animal interactions
- Keywords
- human-pet relationship, family formation, parenting roles, childless families, family change, human-animal relations, dogs, cats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review