After the Blackbird Whistles: Listening to Silence in Classrooms
Abstract
Background/Context: Students spend a large part of their time in schools in silence. However, teachers tend to spend most of their time attending to student talk. Anthropological and linguistic research has contributed to an understanding of silence in particular communities, offering explanations for students’ silence in school. This research raised questions about the silence of marginalized groups of students in classrooms, highlighting teachers’ role in this silencing and drawing on limited meanings of silence. More recently, research on silence has conceptualized silence as a part of a continuum. Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study: The purpose of this project was to review existing literature and draw on two longitudinal research studies to understand the functions and uses of silence in everyday classroom practice. I explore the question, How might paying attention to the productivity of student silence and the possibilities it contains add to our understanding of student silence in educational settings? Silence holds multiple meanings for individuals within and across racial, ethnic, and cultural groups. However, in schools, silence is often assigned a limited number of meanings. This article seeks to add to educators’ and researchers’ tools for interpreting classroom silence. Research Design: The article is based on two longitudinal qualitative studies. The first was an ethnographic study of the literacy practices of high school students in a multiracial high school on the West Coast. This study was designed with the goal of learning about adolescents’ literacy practices in and out of school during their final year of high school and in their first few years as high school graduates. The second study documents discourses of race and race relations in a postdesegregated middle school. The goal of this 3-year study was to gather the missing student perspectives on their racialized experiences in school during the desegregation time period. Conclusions/Recommendations: Understanding the role of silence for the individual and the class as a whole is a complex process that may require new ways of conceptualizing listening. I conclude that an understanding of the meanings of silence through the practice of careful listening and inquiry shifts a teacher's practice and changes a teacher's understanding of students’ participation. I suggest that teachers redefine participation in classrooms to include silence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Schultz noted that students who think quickly and formulate articulate responses are often acknowledged by the teacher, but their speed does not necessarily mean they think more productively than their silent peers.
“Schultz (2010) noted that students who think quickly and formulate their ideas into articulate responses are often acknowledged by the teacher, but their speed does not necessarily mean that they think more productively than their silent peers.”
From How vocal and silent forms of participation in combination relate to student achievement (2023) · cites this paper as Schultz, 2010
Cites
Wait Time: Slowing Down May Be A Way of Speeding Up!
Rowe, M. B. (1986) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/002248718603700110 · Cited by 534 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How vocal and silent forms of participation in combination relate to student achievement
Sedova, K., & Sedlacek, M. (2023) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-022-09609-1 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Schultz (2010) noted that students who think quickly and formulate their ideas into articulate responses are often acknowledged by the teacher, but their speed does not necessarily mean that they think more productively than their silent peers.”
BackgroundPeng, F., Kang, L., Shi, J., & Liu, M. (2023) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs13030193 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Analysis of classroom silence behaviors among Chinese and Korean undergraduates
Zhang, J., Fang, Z., & Rhee, G. S. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1674145 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schultz, K.
- Affiliations
- Mills College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schultz, Katherine
- ORCID
- Schultz, Katherine
- Venue
- Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2833-2849
- ISSN
- 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 0161-4681
- 1467-9620
- OpenAlex
- W100300677
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 11.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Linguistics and Education Research
- Keywords
- classroom silence, student silence, listening, marginalized students, racialized students, literacy practices, adolescents, race relations, desegregation, teacher practices, student participation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review