Cited by 207Higher Education Research StudiesEvaluation of Teaching PracticesStudent Assessment and Feedback

Where a is Ordinary: The Evolution of American College and University Grading, 1940-2009

Rojstaczer, Stuart, Healy, Christopher·2012·Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education

Abstract

Background/Context: College grades can influence a student's graduation prospects, academic motivation, postgraduate job choice, professional and graduate school selection, and access to loans and scholarships. Despite the importance of grades, national trends in grading practices have not been examined in over a decade, and there has been a limited effort to examine the historical evolution of college grading. Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study: Here we look at the evolution of grading over time and space at American colleges and universities over the last 70 years. Our data provide a means to examine how instructors’ assessments of excellence, mediocrity, and failure have changed in higher education. Data Collection and Analysis: We have collected historical and contemporary data on A–F letter grades awarded from over 200 four-year colleges and universities. Our contemporary data on grades come from 135 schools, with a total enrollment of 1.5 million students. Research Design: Through the use of averages over time and space as well as regression models, we examine how grading has changed temporally and how grading is a function of school selectivity, school type, and geographic region. Findings/Results: Contemporary data indicate that, on average across a wide range of schools, A's represent 43% of all letter grades, an increase of 28 percentage points since 1960 and 12 percentage points since 1988. D's and F's total typically less than 10% of all letter grades. Private colleges and universities give, on average, significantly more A's and B's combined than public institutions with equal student selectivity. Southern schools grade more harshly than those in other regions, and science and engineering-focused schools grade more stringently than those emphasizing the liberal arts. At schools with modest selectivity, grading is as generous as it was in the mid-1980s at highly selective schools. These prestigious schools have, in turn, continued to ramp up their grades. It is likely that at many selective and highly selective schools, undergraduate GPAs are now so saturated at the high end that they have little use as a motivator of students and as an evaluation tool for graduate and professional schools and employers. Conclusions/Recommendations: As a result of instructors gradually lowering their standards, A has become the most common grade on American college campuses. Without regulation, or at least strong grading guidelines, grades at American institutions of higher learning likely will continue to have less and less meaning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/016146811211400707

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many of those bemoaning recent trends in grade inflation in higher education point to the abandonment of curved grading as a major factor.

    “Indeed, many of those bemoaning recent trends in grade inflation in higher education (though less prevalent in the sciences) point to the abandonment of curved grading as a major factor (Rojstaczer and Healy, 2012).”

    From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Rojstaczer and Healy, 2012

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 207

Authors
Rojstaczer, S., & Healy, C.
Affiliations
  • Independent Scholar
  • Furman University (US)
Venue
Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
Published
2012-07
Volume
114
Issue
7
Pages
1-23
ISSN
  • 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
  • 0161-4681
  • 1467-9620
OpenAlex
W158241776
Cited by
207
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
80.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
letter grades, grading practices, grade inflation, academic standards, school selectivity, undergraduate GPA, higher education history, grading criteria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review