Cited by 10Higher Education Research StudiesEducational Outcomes and InfluencesEducation and Military Integration

Do Community College Students Benefit from Federal Work-Study Participation?

Yu, Hongwei, Mckinney, Lyle, Carales, Vincent D.·2020·Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education

Abstract

Background Prior studies suggest that Federal Work-Study (FWS) participation is positively associated with student learning, persistence, and academic achievement at four-year institutions. Limited research, however, has evaluated whether FWS participation improves academic success among students attending community colleges. Purpose and Research Questions The purpose of this study was to determine whether and how FWS participation impacted academic performance and enrollment outcomes among a racially/ethnically diverse sample of students attending a large, urban community college (UCC) system in Texas. There were two research questions: (1) What are the characteristics of students at UCC who participated in FWS, compared with their peers who did not participate? (2) After controlling for self-selection bias, are there significant differences in academic success (i.e., cumulative GPA; credential attainment and/or four-year transfer) among UCC students who did and did not participate in the FWS program? Research Design The longitudinal data set (fall 2010 through summer 2016) analyzed in this study was built using detailed student-level transcript data records. The full sample included 8,837 students who had filed a Free Application for Federal Student Aid (a necessary step to receive FWS funding), but the primary focus was on the subsample of FWS participants (n = 260). Descriptive analysis was performed to compare the demographic and academic characteristics of FWS participa…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/016146812012200111

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A separate matching-based study using administrative data from a single community college found positive effects on credential completion and/or transfer.

    “A separate matching-based study using administrative data from a single community college also found positive effects on credential completion and/or transfer (Yu, McKinney, & Carales, 2020).”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Yu, McKinney, & Carales, 2020

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 64 · Cited by 10

Authors
Yu, H., Mckinney, L., & Carales, V. D.
Affiliations
  • Texas State University (US)
  • University of Houston (US)
Venue
Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
Published
2020-01
Volume
122
Issue
1
Pages
1-36
ISSN
  • 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
  • 0161-4681
  • 1467-9620
OpenAlex
W3093195333
Cited by
10
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Military Integration
Keywords
Federal Work-Study, community college students, academic performance, GPA, credential attainment, vertical transfer, student persistence, self-selection bias, educational equity, low-income students, African American students, program redesign

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review