Cited by 361Critical Race Theory in EducationSchool Choice and PerformanceEducational Theory and Curriculum Studies

Detracking: The Social Construction of Ability, Cultural Politics, and Resistance to Reform

Oakes, Jeannie, Wells, Amy Stuart, Jones, Makeba, Datnow, Amanda·1997·Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education

Abstract

Structural changes necessary in detracking efforts challenge not only the technical dimensions of schooling, but also the normative and political dimensions. We argue that detracking reform confronts fundamental issues of power, control, and legitimacy that are played out in ideological struggles over the meaning of knowledge, intelligence, ability, and merit. This article presents results from a three-year longitudinal case study of ten racially and socioeconomically mixed secondary schools participating in detracking reform. We connect prevailing norms about race and social class that inform educators’, parents’, and students’ conceptions of intelligence, ability, and giftedness with the local political context of detracking. By examining these ideological aspects of detracking we make a case for reexamining common presumptions that resistance to policies providing greater opportunities to low-income and minority children is driven by rational estimates of the learning costs and benefits associated with such reforms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/016146819709800305

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The implementation of de-tracking in schools has been fraught with challenges and tremendously complex, particularly with the attempt to transform parents' and students' long-held, deeply-ingrained dispositions regarding the acquisition of knowledge and privilege that is rooted in years of tracking.

    “The implementation of de-tracking in schools have been fraught with challenges and tremendously complex, not only with the logistics, but particularly with the attempt to transform parents' and students' long-held, deeply-ingrained dispositions regarding the acquisition of knowledge and privilege that is rooted in years of tracking (Oakes, Wells, Jones, & Datnow, 1997).”

    From The Relationship of High School Curriculum Tracks to Degree Attainment and Occupational Earnings (2009) · cites this paper as Oakes, Wells, Jones, & Datnow, 1997

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oakes, J., Wells, A. S., Jones, M., & Datnow, A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
Published
1997-01
Volume
98
Issue
3
Pages
482-510
ISSN
  • 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
  • 0161-4681
  • 1467-9620
OpenAlex
W2725780926
Cited by
361
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 23
FWCI
33.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
Keywords
detracking, gifted education, cultural politics, resistance to educational reform, race and class, secondary schools, low-income students, minority students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review