The DOI matches its Crossref record.
“In Order to Aid in Diffusing Useful and Practical Information”: Agricultural Extension and Boundary Organizations
Abstract
Agricultural decision making is characterized by two challenges common to multiple arenas: linking science to decision making and linking science and decision making across multiple levels. The U.S. agricultural research, education, and extension system was designed to address these challenges. By investigating this system, this study deepens the understanding of science and decision making, specifically exploring the notion of boundary organizations in two significant ways. First, it provides a preliminary test of the hypothesis that boundary organizations mediate between the shifting domains of science and policy, finding that they are instrumental in creating and maintaining an integrated system of assessment and decision making for addressing depletion of the High Plains Aquifer. Second, it extends the concept of boundary organization beyond the science-policy dimension to incorporate the dimension of levels of organization—not only bridging science and policy but linking science and policy across different levels (e.g., the local, state, and national levels).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Knowledge systems for sustainable development
Cash, D. W., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N. M., Eckley, N., Guston, D. H., Jäger, J., & Mitchell, R. B. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1231332100 · Cited by 3,660
Self-citationScale and Cross-Scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World
Cash, D. W., Adger, W. N., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., Olsson, P., Pritchard, L., & Young, O. (2006) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-01759-110208 · Cited by 2,254
Self-citationSalience, Credibility, Legitimacy and Boundaries: Linking Research, Assessment and Decision Making
Cash, D., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N., Eckley, N., & J�ger, J. (2003) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.372280 · Cited by 630
Self-citationVogel, C., Moser, S. C., Kasperson, R. E., & Dabelko, G. D. (2007) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.05.002 · Cited by 587
Clark, W. C., Tomich, T. P., van Noordwijk, M., Guston, D., Catacutan, D., Dickson, N. M., & McNie, E. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0900231108 · Cited by 568
Metadata
- Authors
- Cash, D. W.
- Venue
- Science, Technology, & Human Values
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 431-453
- ISSN
- 0162-2439 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8251
- OpenAlex
- W2126706267
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “In Order to Aid in Diffusing Useful and Practical Information”: Agricultural Extension and Boundary Organizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/016224390102600403
- The paper
- Cash, D. W. (2001). “In Order to Aid in Diffusing Useful and Practical Information”: Agricultural Extension and Boundary Organizations. Science, Technology, & Human Values. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390102600403
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.