Cited by 683Ethics and Social Impacts of AITechnology, Environment, Urban PlanningInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Materializing Morality: Design Ethics and Technological Mediation

Verbeek, Peter-Paul·2006·Science, Technology, & Human Values

Abstract

During the past decade, the “script” concept, indicating how technologies prescribe human actions, has acquired a central place in STS. Until now, the concept has mainly functioned in descriptive settings. This article will deploy it in a normative setting. When technologies coshape human actions, they give material answers to the ethical question of how to act. This implies that engineers are doing “ethics by other means”: they materialize morality. The article will explore the implications of this insight for engineering ethics. It first augments the script concept by developing the notion of technological mediation. After this, it investigates how the concept of mediation could be made fruitful for design ethics. It discusses how the ambition to design behaviorinfluencing technologies raises moral questions itself and elaborates two methods for anticipating technological mediation in the design process: performing mediation analyses and using an augmented version of constructive technology assessment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0162243905285847

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 683

Authors
Verbeek, P.-P.
Affiliations
University of Twente (NL)
Corresponding author
Verbeek, Peter-Paul
Venue
Science, Technology, & Human Values
Published
2006-05
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
361-380
ISSN
  • 0162-2439 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8251
OpenAlex
W2128868982
Cited by
683
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 21
FWCI
35.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science Technology & Human Values (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Technology, Environment, Urban Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
technological mediation, engineering ethics, design ethics, constructive technology assessment, mediation analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review