Cited by 17Media and Digital CommunicationNews Media Framing and Political CommunicationGender, Feminism, and Media

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Television and Black Twitter in South Africa: Our Perfect Wedding

Smit, Alexia, Bosch, Tanja·2020·Media, Culture & Society

Abstract

This article examines Twitter use by audiences of the popular South African television show, Our Perfect Wedding. We argue that the show’s Twitter feed provides an extension of South Africa’s ‘Black Twitter’ facilitating a space for recognition and group identity for Black South African television viewers. Such a space is significant since Black audiences have been neglected in the short history of South African television broadcasting. On Our Perfect Wedding, broadcast on a satellite television service DStv to paying subscribers, questions of class and race are salient for an audience group prized as an emerging market of Black middle-class viewers. Through qualitative analysis of a sample of tweets featuring the hashtag, #OPWMzansi ( Our Perfect Wedding South Africa), we demonstrate how Twitter is used for the performance and negotiation of class and race for the audience. The comedy of the show’s Twitter commentary is largely dependent upon judgements around class, taste and language. While the Twitter feed features creative user contributions, the #OPWMzansi network reveals that much of the communication is prompted and networked back to the official programme Twitter site, demonstrating the centrality of the traditional television broadcaster to Twitter interactions with the text.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0163443720926040

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1080/02560046.2018.1552979 · DOI
  2. Baines G, 1998, Mots Pluriels, 7, 1
  3. 10.1080/10382040608668531 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/1467-8330.00104 · DOI
  5. Bosch T, 2010, Communicare: Journal For Communication Sciences in Southern Africa, 29, 99
  6. Boyd D, Crawford K (2011) Six provocations for Big Data. Paper presented at a decade in Internet time: symposium on the dynamics of the Internet and society, Oxford, September. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1926431
  7. 10.1080/17577632.2018.1592284 · DOI
  8. Bruns A, 2014, Twitter and Society, 137
  9. 10.1515/commun-2014-0009 · DOI
  10. Dawkins R, 1976, The Selfish Gene
  11. Deller R, 2011, Participations, 8, 216
  12. 10.5040/9780755619061 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/1461444811405805 · DOI
  14. Harrington S, 2014, Twitter and Society, 237
  15. Harrington S, 2012, Audience Interactivity and Participation, 10, 13
  16. 10.1080/1369118X.2012.756053 · DOI
  17. 10.1075/pbns.98.23hol · DOI
  18. Ives S, 2007, ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 6, 153
  19. Kavka M, 2008, Reality Television, Affect and Intimacy: Reality Matters
  20. 10.1080/02560040903509218 · DOI
  21. Leavitt A, 2014, Twitter and Society, 137
  22. Milton VC, Fourie PJ (2015) South Africa: A free media still in the making, in Mapping BRICS media. In: Nordenstreng K, Thussu DK (eds) London: Routledge, pp 181–201. · DOI
  23. Schmidt J, 2014, Twitter and Society, 3
  24. 10.1177/1527476415616192 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/02500167.2016.1252781 · DOI
  26. Southall R, 2016, New Black Middle Class in South Africa
  27. Teer-Tomaselli R, 2001, Media, Democracy and Renewal in Southern Africa, 123

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Exploring #Diasporawars on Black Twitter

    Musgrave, T., Ye, Y., Toyama, K., Schoenebeck, S., & Threats, M. (2025) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051251352834 · Cited by 3

    “While most studies have focused on Black Twitter within the United States, there is a growing interest in its global relevance (Feldman & De Kosnik, 2019; Risam & Josephs, 2021; Smit & Bosch, 2020).”

Metadata

Authors
Smit, A., & Bosch, T.
Affiliations
University of Cape Town (ZA)
Corresponding author
Smit, Alexia
Venue
Media, Culture & Society
Published
2020-05-29
Volume
42
Issue
7-8
Pages
1512-1527
ISSN
  • 0163-4437 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-3675
OpenAlex
W3029949682
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Media Culture & Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
Keywords
Black Twitter, television audiences, audience engagement, social media, race and class, hashtag networks, audience identification, television comedy, South African television

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review