The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Whose pedagogy is it anyway? Decolonizing the syllabus through a critical embrace of difference
Abstract
The higher-education student body in the United States is increasingly diverse. Diversity and transnationalism are present in the classroom through the increased numbers of students and instructors who are international and/or non-White-identifying. However, syllabi in media, communication, and cultural studies remain centered around an orthodox body of literature that has come to be conceived of as the canon, consisting of scholars who are mostly white, male, and U.S.-American or European. This essay brings communication, culture, and media studies theories into conversation with critical pedagogy to suggest changes in the organization of syllabi and class activities. Namely, I use participatory culture, critical and decolonial pedagogical theories, and Black and transnational feminist pedagogy, to suggest a critical embrace of different as an approach for designing syllabi that center the students rather than the Western-rooted tradition. This paper is part of the critical body of knowledge that pushes for a decolonizing and transnationalizing intervention in higher education.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 32,792
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- 10.1215/9780822386988 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781315159164-6 · DOI
- 10.1080/713845282 · DOI
- Bhambra GK, 2018, Decolonizing the University
- 10.1515/9781400828654 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1525/9780520972148 · DOI
- Dennis CA, 2018, Decolonizing the University, 190, 10.2307/j.ctv4ncntg.13 · DOI
- Freire P, 1999, Pedagogy of the Oppressed
- Henry A, 2005, Counterpoints, 237, 89
- hooks b, 1994, Teaching to Transgress
- hooks b, 2010, Teaching Critical Thinking
- Huston TA, 2006, Seattle Journal for Social Justice, 4, 591
- 10.1177/1354856513482090 · DOI
- Jenkins H, 2018, Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture
- Last A, 2018, Decolonising the University, 208, 10.2307/j.ctv4ncntg.14 · DOI
- Mignolo W, 2000, Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking
- Pratt ML, 1991, Profession, 33
- 10.1037/a0019865 · DOI
- Stratton J, 1996, Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies, 360
- Waisbord S, 2019, Communication: A Post-Discipline
Cited by
Reframing the impostor phenomenon for Black college students
Connaught, G. (2024) · Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice · doi:10.56433/pv5se246 · Cited by 2
“In addition, professors and other stakeholders can work on decolonising course syllabi so that course content and materials are more reflective of anti-racist and anti-oppressive frameworks (Sadat Ahadi & Guerrero, 2020; Mintz, 2021; Zidani, 2021).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Zidani, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zidani, Sulafa
- ORCID
- Zidani, Sulafa
- Venue
- Media, Culture & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-12-15
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 970-978
- ISSN
- 0163-4437 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3675
- OpenAlex
- W3111196739
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 6.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Media Culture & Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Critical and Liberation Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Keywords
- critical pedagogy, canons, diversity in higher education, transnationalism, participatory culture, Black feminist pedagogy, decolonial pedagogy, media education, cultural studies pedagogy, Western canon, student-centered curriculum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Whose pedagogy is it anyway? Decolonizing the syllabus through a critical embrace of difference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0163443720980922
- The paper
- Zidani, S. (2021). Whose pedagogy is it anyway? Decolonizing the syllabus through a critical embrace of difference. Media, Culture & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720980922