CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 588Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchAging and Gerontology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Positive Aspects of Caregiving: Contributions of the REACH Project to the Development of New Measures for Alzheimer’s Caregiving

Tarlow, Barbara J., Wisniewski, Stephen R., Belle, Steven H., Rubert, Mark, Ory, Marcia G., Gallagher-Thompson, Dolores·2004·Research on Aging
DOI 10.1177/0164027504264493
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess a newly developed measure for the positive aspects of caregiving using a sample of dementia caregivers. The measure was developed and administered to 1,229 participants in a national collaborative Alzheimer’s disease caregiver study and evaluated for validity and reliability using standard psychometric analyses. Factor analysis identified two components in this nine-item measure: Self-Affirmation and Outlook on Life. Cronbach’s alphas for the components were .86 and .80, respectively. For the entire scale, Cronbach’s alpha was .89. The Positive Aspects of Caregiving measure, tested with a large, diverse, and well-characterized sample shows promise as a valid and reliable instrument. With additional implementation and testing, the measure has the potential to substantially increase our understanding of basic caregiving research and the outcomes of intervention efforts.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0164027504264493

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Anastas, J. W., 1990, Social Work, 35, 405
  2. Kemp, B., 1996, “The Role of Caregiver Appraisal, Coping Method and Social Support in the Stress of Dementia Caregivers of Four Different Ethnic Groups.”
  3. National Alliance for Caregiving and American Association of Retired Persons, 1997, “Family Caregiving in the US: Findings From a National Survey
  4. Picot, S. J., 1995, Journal of the National Black Nurses Association, 7, 29
  5. 10.1037/0882-7974.7.4.622 · DOI
  6. Wykle, M., 1991, Journal of National Black Nurses Association, 5, 29

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 588

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Tarlow, B. J., Wisniewski, S. R., Belle, S. H., Rubert, M., Ory, M. G., & Gallagher-Thompson, D.
Affiliations
  • Hebrew SeniorLife (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Realistic Education in Action Coalition to Foster Health (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
ORCID
Venue
Research on Aging
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2004-07
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
429-453
ISSN
  • 0164-0275 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7573
DOI
10.1177/0164027504264493
OpenAlex
W2055264743
Cited by
588
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 28
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Research on Aging (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
positive aspects of caregiving, dementia caregivers, caregiver well-being, scale development, psychometric validation, self-affirmation, worldview, caregiver outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review