CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 284Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionAging and Gerontology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gratitude Toward God, Stress, and Health in Late Life

Krause, Neal·2006·Research on Aging
DOI 10.1177/0164027505284048
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The purpose of this studywas to see if feeling grateful to God reduces the deleterious effects of stress on health in late life. In addition, an effort was made to test for gender differences in this process. Three main findings emerged from the analysis of data provided by a nationwide sample of older adults. First, the data suggest that olderwomen are more likely to feel grateful to God than older men. Second, the results revealed that the effects of stress (e.g., living in a deteriorated neighborhood) on health are reduced for older people who feel more grateful to God. Finally, the analyses indicated that the potentially important stress-buffering properties of gratitude toward God emerge primarily among older women but not older men.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0164027505284048

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Aiken, Leona S., 1991, Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interaction Effects
  2. Barna, George, 2002, The State of the Church 2002
  3. Edwards, Jonathan, 1746, The Religious Affections
  4. 10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.377 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Fetzer Institute/National Institute on AgingWork Group, 1999, Multidimensional Measurement of Religiousness/Spirituality for Use in Health Research
  6. Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics, 2004, Older Americans 2004: Key Indicators of Well-Being
  7. Gardner, Wendi L., 2001, The Psychology of Gender, 169
  8. Krause, Neal, 2003, Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 23, 223
  9. McCraty, Rollin, 2004, The Psychology of Gratitude, 230
  10. McFadden, Susan H., 2003, Aging, Spirituality, and Religion, 47
  11. Solomon, Robert C., 1995, Emotions in Asian Thought, 253

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 284

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Krause, N.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Krause, Neal
ORCID
Krause, Neal
Venue
Research on Aging
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2006-03
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
163-183
ISSN
  • 0164-0275 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7573
DOI
10.1177/0164027505284048
OpenAlex
W2071692924
Semantic Scholar
551c5263fa34e33bb73c4fbd4e460423943005d7
Cited by
284
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Research on Aging (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
religious gratitude, stress buffering, late-life health, older adults, gender differences, neighborhood deterioration, stress and health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review